From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <toke@toke.dk>
Received: from mail.toke.dk (mail.toke.dk [52.28.52.200])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F037F3CB36
 for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 06:52:06 -0500 (EST)
From: Toke =?utf-8?Q?H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= <toke@toke.dk>
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=toke.dk; s=20161023;
 t=1543319525; bh=6UevEh/du3R/eJEc10a6qRhwjtSzdaCrgPVz/V2d7T8=;
 h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From;
 b=NSErTXvfe7KP9ADnYIDur8pF+Vfe9JuhqvBKcRZ3C5j+ZNA64kmv9l9cUN/fxGoTb
 yZwulFZFFyz2i0gYv5g2R3dh9wMFwUEj70R+HNjdsJKhdtezUruVwdASSkFC9DytQK
 vCvL3YKq3aQ4NPSyCypM3ycK49qg0fAYVoIdyDsVAk7qHaPLXfoUJMgKj7tu7GMiGL
 thmV1iVxpbZxp5NLNMD7dt87sXGaYPW9ah25Nd4uel3ceENOOG7HHsoDzgMUX4idBU
 mXTK8rHW+ulP9tm85qTArw+0lzRYN7LwHxCy2ZDHTJ3+UJWjK5nB/ynaF5rXrIbTo8
 p+IqUBQwGqG0w==
To: Luca Muscariello <luca.muscariello@gmail.com>,
 Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
Cc: bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAHx=1M6K75N1rPt3VTOUNqq2A=uQ1FoneyjyhMaoqNoB9N4=2Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <65EAC6C1-4688-46B6-A575-A6C7F2C066C5@heistp.net>
 <CB93246F-CDAB-4E45-B6D0-3D988CC5DC57@gmail.com>
 <CAHx=1M6K75N1rPt3VTOUNqq2A=uQ1FoneyjyhMaoqNoB9N4=2Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 12:52:05 +0100
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
Message-ID: <877egyspp6.fsf@toke.dk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Subject: Re: [Bloat] when does the CoDel part of fq_codel help in the real
	world?
X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat <bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/bloat>,
 <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat>
List-Post: <mailto:bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat>,
 <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 11:52:07 -0000

Luca Muscariello <luca.muscariello@gmail.com> writes:

> This procedure would allow to size FQ_codel but also SFQ.
> It would be interesting to compare the two under this buffer sizing.
> It would also be interesting to compare another mechanism that we have
> mentioned during the defense
> which is AFD + a sparse flow queue. Which is, BTW, already available in
> Cisco nexus switches for data centres.

One think I wondered about afterwards was whether or not it would be
feasible (as in, easy to add, or maybe even supported in current
versions) to tie in an AQM to an AFD-type virtual fairness queueing
system? You could keep the AQM state variables along with the per-flow
state and react appropriately. Any reason why this wouldn't work?

-Toke