From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.taht.net (mail.taht.net [176.58.107.8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 607E43BA8E for ; Sun, 26 Nov 2017 18:11:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from nemesis.taht.net (unknown [IPv6:2603:3024:1536:86f0:2e0:4cff:fec1:1206]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.taht.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A97A6221CE; Sun, 26 Nov 2017 23:11:56 +0000 (UTC) From: Dave Taht To: Jan Ceuleers Cc: Dave Taht , Jonathan Morton , bloat References: <20171124092021.DC01D40605C@ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net> <4a37c330-cb03-23eb-f705-743c6cb30c15@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2017 15:11:55 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Jan Ceuleers's message of "Sun, 26 Nov 2017 19:43:41 +0100") Message-ID: <877eucr5xg.fsf@nemesis.taht.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Bloat] Steam In Home Streaming on ath9k wifi X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2017 23:11:58 -0000 Jan Ceuleers writes: > Resending with the from-address with which I'm subscribed to the list > > On 26/11/17 18:53, Dave Taht wrote: >> On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 2:05 AM, Jonathan Morton wrote: >>> Another explanation for latency spikes on the order of 100ms is that a >>> periodic (and wholly unnecessary) scan for other APs is run, which requires >>> the wifi radio to be temporarily tuned away from the currently associated >>> AP's frequency. >> >> I'd written that up here: >> >> http://blog.cerowrt.org/post/disabling_channel_scans/ >> >> Which was improved in some release of network manager >> >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/373680 > > Dave, > > Thanks, but that's not the same problem I experienced. Yours was > entirely client-side (i.e. it was behaviour of Network Manager). My > problem was due to the AP asking the client to periodically perform > scans (by means of hostapd's obss_interval parameter). Got it. Thanks! > > Similar (but not the same) symptoms - different cause. > > Jan > > > _______________________________________________ > Bloat mailing list > Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat