From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@toke.dk>
To: Alan Jenkins <alan.christopher.jenkins@gmail.com>
Cc: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Bloat] review: Deployment of RITE mechanisms, in use-case trial testbeds report part 1
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2016 22:24:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a8mk5y0s.fsf@toke.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56D303A6.4050302@gmail.com> (Alan Jenkins's message of "Sun, 28 Feb 2016 14:26:46 +0000")
Alan Jenkins <alan.christopher.jenkins@gmail.com> writes:
>> Exactly. And note how they just so happen to pick 11 total flows (10
>> competing, one video) to share the bottleneck, putting the per-flow
>> throughput just below the rate needed to go up one quality level. What a
>> coincidence. At least it shows how difficult it is to design experiments
>> that put fairness queueing in a bad light ;)
> Ug. I try not to assume malice. It does indeed come across as
> motivated absence of curiosity.
Oh, didn't necessarily mean it was malicious. Can totally picture the
discussion landing on 10 competing flows (a nice round number). However,
it does just so happen to result in there being a bit too little
bandwidth for the 2Mbps video flow...
-Toke
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-28 21:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <56BB8F05.2030006@mti-systems.com>
[not found] ` <BF6B00CC65FD2D45A326E74492B2C19FB763038A@FR711WXCHMBA05.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com>
2016-02-27 19:04 ` Dave Täht
2016-02-28 13:33 ` Alan Jenkins
2016-02-28 13:39 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2016-02-28 14:26 ` Alan Jenkins
2016-02-28 20:20 ` Juliusz Chroboczek
2016-02-28 21:27 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2016-02-28 21:24 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [this message]
2016-02-29 17:55 ` Dave Taht
2016-03-02 11:26 ` [Bloat] [aqm] " De Schepper, Koen (Nokia - BE)
2016-03-02 18:09 ` [Bloat] " Fred Baker (fred)
2016-03-02 20:53 ` Alan Jenkins
2016-03-02 21:47 ` Fred Baker (fred)
2016-03-03 12:13 ` [Bloat] [aqm] " Ingemar Johansson S
2016-03-03 12:31 ` Luca De Cicco
2016-03-03 16:09 ` [Bloat] HAS traffic behaviors Dave Täht
2016-03-03 18:49 ` [Bloat] [aqm] " Luca De Cicco
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87a8mk5y0s.fsf@toke.dk \
--to=toke@toke.dk \
--cc=alan.christopher.jenkins@gmail.com \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox