From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.toke.dk (mail.toke.dk [45.145.95.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B8DA3B2A4 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 15:37:13 -0400 (EDT) From: Toke =?utf-8?Q?H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=toke.dk; s=20161023; t=1617046632; bh=Dq5H4pAlZt0aQVM849bVzGoy432WOsd6DAS/SB6vGS4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=Ven8SDgtdyIMXfje19Hyk29BKklRSxN97j4x4mhyeopf/jm5lnEE2q4CYm26Wod+/ VmRkgDN5hRv62iYgBKLVwzui30NqY9fLbfV2bz53ea9+PHlnM6OjGyA/fnPY6VjKDV M2VNf5DkNDxXZQlH0rn8TVoBbUO2HoGxJHyS/yCtysBQYTqQR6iUyysrF/qly1QhAA 7sD61bAwkepRV0HNMTfXuBThkA63nvVhVxmT3f8WttJifMW1ICvQoEr9i1oerBRj1g 0PrJgXh3mouFNnJ6IgirCu9+9AaJ/KtfQGSEzlzG2sCxyWQANtAbDeqOlJh99cGysC d9NtVTsdydVQg== To: Aaron Wood , Dave Taht Cc: bloat In-Reply-To: References: <87pmzla3vw.fsf@toke.dk> Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 21:37:11 +0200 X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Message-ID: <87blb1sqe0.fsf@toke.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Bloat] Netperf re-licensed as MIT X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 19:37:13 -0000 Aaron Wood writes: > One of my long concerns with the RRUL test is that the ICMP ping test > portion is not isochronous That would be the UDP_RR test, you mean (ICMP is isochronous)? Yeah, that is a bit annoying, but as Dave says if irtt is available, Flent will use that, and that *is* isochronous :) -Toke