From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@toke.dk>
To: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>, bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Bloat] weird problem WRT1200 + CAKE on OpenWrt 18.06.2
Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2019 22:33:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87blwzs8gc.fsf@toke.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1907310949260.16521@uplift.swm.pp.se>
Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> writes:
> Hi,
>
> I've been running openwrt 18.06.2 for a long time on my WRT1200AC, with
> CAKE, and everything has been great. I always got A+ in dslreports for
> bufferbloat. I have a 250/100 ETTH connection (IP over ethernet native, no
> PPPoE, no PON).
>
> I noticed some intermittent network stuttering issues I wanted to diagnose
> last week, so I started looking into this. When doing the test I get
> +100ms spikes in the downstream direction when I run CAKE. If I instead
> switch to FQ_CODEL I do not see these spikes. As a matter of fact, if I
> set my downstream to 300 when running cake and let my ISP handle the
> buffering then I get an average of 5-10ms worth of buffering with no
> spikes. My ISP isn't bloated in that direction.
Hmm, this seems like it's an issue with the timers CAKE uses for
shaping. Not really sure why that would happen...
> # tc qdisc show dev eth1.2
> qdisc cake 801f: root refcnt 2 bandwidth 100Mbit diffserv3 triple-isolate nonat nowash no-ack-filter split-gso rtt 100.0ms noatm overhead 22
> qdisc ingress ffff: parent ffff:fff1 ----------------
>
> tc qdisc show dev ifb4eth1.2
> qdisc cake 8020: root refcnt 2 bandwidth 240Mbit diffserv3 triple-isolate nonat nowash no-ack-filter split-gso rtt 100.0ms noatm overhead 22
This looks like you're running sqm-scripts on a VLAN interface? Does it
make any difference if you run it on the physical eth1?
-Toke
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-08 20:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-31 7:58 Mikael Abrahamsson
2019-08-08 20:33 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [this message]
2019-08-09 4:21 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2019-08-09 4:35 ` David Lang
2019-08-09 8:38 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-08-09 17:44 ` Rosen Penev
2019-08-09 17:49 ` Sebastian Moeller
2019-08-09 17:53 ` Jonathan Morton
2019-08-09 17:58 ` Sebastian Moeller
2019-08-09 17:57 ` Rosen Penev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87blwzs8gc.fsf@toke.dk \
--to=toke@toke.dk \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=swmike@swm.pp.se \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox