From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.taht.net (mail.taht.net [IPv6:2a01:7e00::f03c:91ff:feae:7028]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B819C3CB35 for ; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 12:34:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from dancer.taht.net (unknown [IPv6:2603:3024:1536:86f0:eea8:6bff:fefe:9a2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.taht.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 96E8A213CB; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 16:33:59 +0000 (UTC) From: Dave Taht To: Ali Cc: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net References: Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 09:33:46 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Ali's message of "Fri, 19 Oct 2018 13:25:07 -0400") Message-ID: <87d0s2ym8l.fsf@taht.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Bloat] eero using fq_codel and Cake X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 16:34:01 -0000 Ali writes: > I've been reading this list for a while but never subscribed bc I > don't really have anything to contribute. > > Well, I saw this on the eero subreddit and thought it was worth > posting about. > > https://www.reddit.com/r/eero/comments/9nvuk8/comment/e7qgg4c?st=JNGA5S6H&sh=04ae8c47 > "It's fq-codel inside the mesh, and then CAKE on the uplink, if your > gateway is a second generation eero. If your gateway is a first > generation eero, then it's codel on the uplink too." > > The user 6roybatty6 is an engineer at eero who is active in the > subreddit (the CEO and founder is active, too). Great to see one of > the wireless mesh products out there using fq_codel in their WiFi > implementation and Cake at the router/gateway. thank you for the heads up. I joined that thread. It's great to see our stuff more "out there" and being refined into something mere mortals can use, and hopefully, more often enabled by default. User feedback is valuable. For example the poster asked if "sqm got smarter over time" - and, yea, some deployments are doing that. https://www.reddit.com/r/eero/comments/9nvuk8/does_sqm_get_smarter/ > > Regards, > Ali > > _______________________________________________ > Bloat mailing list > Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat