From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@toke.dk>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Cc: bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Bloat] AQM creeping into L2 equipment
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 17:20:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87eh1wc05c.fsf@toke.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw6vwyuL2xeo3ATEJaakHfTMcR9pCa5aq3grV0oO6A87-A@mail.gmail.com> (Dave Taht's message of "Tue, 18 Mar 2014 14:54:41 -0400")
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 932 bytes --]
Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> writes:
> The standard test that I'm most interested in is the 2 ports into 1 topology:
>
> SOURCE
> |
> SWITCH
> | |
> BOX1 BOX2
Did a couple of tests of this with the default configuration of a Cisco
WS-C2960X-24TD-L switch. Graphs and data files here:
http://kau.toke.dk/experiments/cisco-switch/cisco-c2960x.html
Conclusion: My test boxes need offloads and quite a bit of driver
queueing to drive the 1Gbps link, which makes it difficult to say
anything about the switch...
Haven't fiddled with the QoS settings, but from what I can see they are
rather limited, and takes a great deal of fiddling to setup (at least
for someone who, like me, has pretty much zero experience with Cisco
gear).
If someone has suggestions for other switch configurations that would be
worthwhile testing (as well as some help on how to configure it), I'll
be happy to run the tests.
-Toke
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 489 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-20 16:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-18 14:52 Steinar H. Gunderson
2014-03-18 17:17 ` Dave Taht
2014-03-18 17:53 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2014-03-19 22:22 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2014-03-18 18:05 ` Fred Baker (fred)
2014-03-18 18:54 ` Dave Taht
2014-03-20 16:20 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [this message]
2014-03-20 16:29 ` Dave Taht
2014-03-20 16:44 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2014-03-20 17:14 ` Dave Taht
2014-03-20 19:34 ` Aaron Wood
2014-03-20 20:23 ` Dave Taht
2014-03-20 23:41 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-03-20 23:45 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2014-03-20 23:54 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
[not found] ` <CAAvOmMtt1RCpBfT1MPNh-2FRhQ1GN4xYbfNPLYJwfP6CaP5vow@mail.gmail.com>
2014-03-21 15:06 ` Eric Dumazet
[not found] ` <CAAvOmMvPpmuW1chTdX86s5sQv6X_c622k8YrjW+hN8e5JV+dzA@mail.gmail.com>
2014-03-21 17:51 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-03-21 18:08 ` Dave Taht
2014-03-21 22:00 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-03-21 22:13 ` Dave Taht
2014-03-23 19:27 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-03-21 13:41 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2014-03-21 15:39 ` Dave Taht
2014-03-21 16:42 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2014-03-21 18:34 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2014-03-24 23:16 ` David Lang
2014-03-20 18:16 ` [Bloat] AQM creeping into L2 equipment / 10G not-for-profit playground at tetaneutral.net Laurent GUERBY
2014-03-18 18:57 ` [Bloat] AQM creeping into L2 equipment Dave Taht
2014-03-18 21:06 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2014-03-19 13:11 ` Nikolay Shopik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87eh1wc05c.fsf@toke.dk \
--to=toke@toke.dk \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox