From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-31-ewr.dyndns.com (mxout-100-ewr.mailhop.org [216.146.33.100]) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E444A2E044B for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 01:51:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from scan-31-ewr.mailhop.org (scan-31-ewr.local [10.0.141.237]) by mail-31-ewr.dyndns.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1A756F8431 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 09:51:49 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 () X-Mail-Handler: MailHop by DynDNS X-Originating-IP: 213.186.56.95 Received: from witko.kerneis.info (witko.kerneis.info [213.186.56.95]) by mail-31-ewr.dyndns.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F2D86F6F6B for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 09:51:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bob75-11-78-249-231-16.fbx.proxad.net ([78.249.231.16] helo=trurl.pps.jussieu.fr) by witko.kerneis.info with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PlIKO-0008KA-4w; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 10:51:44 +0100 Received: from jch by trurl.pps.jussieu.fr with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PlIK7-0000dJ-4m; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 10:51:27 +0100 From: Juliusz Chroboczek To: To: Dave Taht References: Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 10:51:22 +0100 Message-ID: <87hbckdt5x.fsf@trurl.pps.jussieu.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 78.249.231.16 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jch@pps.jussieu.fr X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on witko.kerneis.info); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: bloat Subject: Re: [Bloat] TCP vegas vs TCP cubic X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 09:51:52 -0000 > I did some testing on a de-bloated device and vegas actually did > slightly better than cubic That's strange. Vegas should not be reacting to the base delay, only to jitter. --Juliusz