General list for discussing Bufferbloat
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: [Bloat] Flent-farm costs
@ 2019-02-05 14:15 Rich Brown
  2019-02-09 18:25 ` Dave Taht
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Rich Brown @ 2019-02-05 14:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bloat

Dave wrote:

> Costs on the "flent-farm" continue to drop. Our earliest linode
> servers cost $20/month and our two latest ones (nanoservers) cost
> $5/month. For "science!" I've been generally unwilling to
> update/change these much ...

I've been running netperf.bufferbloat.net (the netperf server that we most publicize) for several years. It's a modest OpenVZ VPS from RamNode in Atlanta. It has two failings:

- It costs ~$16/month (I don't mind this expense, but $16/month >> $5/month for the nanoservers)
- About ever third month, its traffic goes over the 4TB/month limit, and RamNode shuts the server off. I regularly run a script to find heavy users and block their IP using iptables. (Many people are running a test every five minutes for days at a time.) But that's a hassle. And buying an additional terabyte per month from RamNode is $10/month, which gets expensive.

To address this, I stood up up a new (KVM-based) VPS with RamNode (also in Atlanta, presumably in their same data center) that will permit more in-depth iptables rules. My goal would be to look at connection frequency, and if someone is trying to do every-five-minute testing, limit their bandwidth to 10kbps. 

This raises a host of questions:

- For Science - the current netperf.bufferbloat.net is atl.richb-hanover.com; the new server is atl2.richb-hanover.com. Do you get similar performance from both servers?

- Is this plan to bandwidth-limit abusers realistic? Will it be possible to design rules that exclude abusers while allowing legitimate research use? (I'm concerned that running five tests in a row in 10 minutes might look like an every-five-minute abuser...)

- Should I use one of the Linode nanoservers?

- Should we move the netperf.bufferbloat.net name to use the existing flent server farm machines?

- Are there other approaches to supporting netperf.bufferbloat.net?

Many thanks!

Rich



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2019-02-09 18:25 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-02-05 14:15 [Bloat] Flent-farm costs Rich Brown
2019-02-09 18:25 ` Dave Taht

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox