From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@toke.dk>
To: "Stephen Hemminger" <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
"Toke Høiland-Jørgensen via Bloat" <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Bloat] Comparing bufferbloat tests (was: We built a new bufferbloat test and keen for feedback)
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2020 17:17:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87k0uyfojb.fsf@toke.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201106080352.415568f8@hermes.local>
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org> writes:
> PS: Why to US providers have such asymmetric bandwidth? Getting something symmetric
> requires going to a $$$ business rate.
For Cable, the DOCSIS standard is asymmetric by design, but not *that*
asymmetric. I *think* the rest is because providers have to assign
channels independently for upstream and downstream, and if they just
assign them all to downstream they can advertise a bigger number...
-Toke
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-06 16:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-04 21:30 [Bloat] We built a new bufferbloat test and keen for feedback Sam Westwood
2020-11-04 23:43 ` Michael Richardson
2020-11-04 23:54 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-11-05 1:52 ` Y
2020-11-05 0:23 ` Dave Collier-Brown
2020-11-05 11:48 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-11-05 13:24 ` [Bloat] Comparing bufferbloat tests (was: We built a new bufferbloat test and keen for feedback) Dave Collier-Brown
2020-11-05 14:24 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-11-05 16:06 ` Arshan Khanifar
2020-11-05 17:25 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-11-06 16:03 ` Stephen Hemminger
2020-11-06 16:17 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [this message]
2020-11-06 17:05 ` Sebastian Moeller
2020-11-08 22:07 ` Arshan Khanifar
2020-11-14 3:37 ` Dave Taht
2020-11-14 23:14 ` Michael Richardson
2020-11-05 8:21 ` [Bloat] We built a new bufferbloat test and keen for feedback Sebastian Moeller
2020-11-05 21:30 ` Sam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87k0uyfojb.fsf@toke.dk \
--to=toke@toke.dk \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox