General list for discussing Bufferbloat
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bloat] Detecting FQ at the bottleneck
@ 2020-10-25 15:06 Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
  2020-10-25 18:51 ` David Collier-Brown
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen @ 2020-10-25 15:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bloat

This popped up in my Google Scholar mentions:

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2010.08362

It proposes using a delay-based CC when FQ is present, and a loss-based
when it isn't. It has a fairly straight-forward mechanism for detecting
an FQ bottleneck: Start two flows where one has 2x the sending rate than
the other, keep increasing their sending rate until both suffer losses,
and observe the goodput at this point: If it's ~1:1 there's FQ,
otherwise there isn't.

They cite 98% detection accuracy using netns-based tests and sch_fq.

-Toke

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-10-25 18:51 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-10-25 15:06 [Bloat] Detecting FQ at the bottleneck Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-10-25 18:51 ` David Collier-Brown

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox