From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.toke.dk (mail.toke.dk [IPv6:2a00:7660:6da:2001::664]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 411F53B2A4 for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 07:58:21 -0400 (EDT) From: Toke =?utf-8?Q?H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=toke.dk; s=20161023; t=1568375899; bh=T/izdDRDp8yIHUp2gD9OAEwvu8Dihxod20WXPC8IrTc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=SVwzpH7FF2o4x5VoOcndLp+XLSzchq7JxNV7NYcNC0t/A0qdc0oQOhcenLz3K3LSJ 3mPuwHQCaNjLGkpKJNUDh3Ry39zR+Gs2E7e3ikc1JougfoPkmd2UvCebWgGqmKTMno 7z3KWWyj8oVICY7TiRYywuslQLRqtGvEKMaySZGboAxVxQAoXsmPkoGc22qUBE/m7G dRTxMyq+CpQaPru0N9rxBtNCY+TqrDu8F+3V5JhncreppV0gLGFm2AN0s9MDKOUP7e GcMQI6RD3m/mxCiOV3WJdkwD5VLgcmo5+0b5vkS4YT55DsXr8oGO2D6NyXKOSG18rX NiwxlrtyUxQfw== To: Dave Taht , David Lang Cc: bloat In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 13:58:18 +0200 X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Message-ID: <87muf8s90l.fsf@toke.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Bloat] Dual Channel Wi-Fi X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 11:58:21 -0000 Dave Taht writes: > There's more to it than that. > > https://www-res.cablelabs.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/24150908/Dual-Channel-Wi-Fi-Performance-Test-Report-June-2019.pdf Looking at the code[0], it seems to be a userspace daemon that does encapsulation of traffic and sends it over a separate, hidden BSS that is access-controlled to only allow stations that already performed their handshake. So, conceptually it turns several WiFi links into a bonded device where the AP can steer the traffic between underlying devices. It's an interesting idea, but I doubt it'll see much deployment: Just the requirement of running a daemon on each client device is bound to put a damper on that. It's not quite clear to me whether the station would need to support associating on multiple bands at the same time; not sure how many clients do that... Also, I wonder how well the userspace encapsulation stuff works on a low-powered AP? -Toke [0] https://github.com/ewsi/dcstad is the client daemon; the github org has the rest.