From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.taht.net (mail.taht.net [IPv6:2a01:7e00::f03c:91ff:feae:7028]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 025043CB36 for ; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 20:46:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from dancer.taht.net (unknown [IPv6:2603:3024:1536:86f0:eea8:6bff:fefe:9a2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.taht.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5225821471; Wed, 17 Oct 2018 00:46:57 +0000 (UTC) From: Dave Taht To: Jan Ceuleers Cc: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net References: <68031ed5-05e5-8f53-5e7d-ef0fce9d08da@kau.se> <20181016080628.2ca3652b@xeon-e3> Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 17:46:44 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Jan Ceuleers's message of "Tue, 16 Oct 2018 17:26:02 +0200") Message-ID: <87o9bth023.fsf@taht.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Bloat] vyatta in AT&T 5G gear X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2018 00:46:59 -0000 Jan Ceuleers writes: > On 16/10/2018 17:14, Dave Taht wrote: >> And what was so wrong with the "everything as a file" model?? > > On a single box - not a lot. > > On a 5G network, which might consist of 10^3 - 10^5 boxes you need > aggregation and abstraction layers. I was mostly just venting. Still... I'd hoped that the next generation fios gear would get bufferbloat right... and with all the 5G boasting about the 1ms mac, that they'd get queuing delay below 20ms also. I was also hoping the DOCSIS 3.1 line cards would get it right... It has been a disappointing day.