General list for discussing Bufferbloat
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bloat] the dslreports png
@ 2015-04-28 14:23 Dave Taht
  2015-04-28 15:22 ` jb
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dave Taht @ 2015-04-28 14:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bloat, Justin Beech

http://dfkrkqaqb1zsx.cloudfront.net/speedtest/cdn/377727.png

is showing the base latency without load. It would be more effective
if it showed the
latency with load.

-- 
Dave Täht
Open Networking needs **Open Source Hardware**

https://plus.google.com/u/0/+EricRaymond/posts/JqxCe2pFr67

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bloat] the dslreports png
  2015-04-28 14:23 [Bloat] the dslreports png Dave Taht
@ 2015-04-28 15:22 ` jb
  2015-04-28 20:21   ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
  2015-04-28 20:24   ` David Lang
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: jb @ 2015-04-28 15:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dave Taht; +Cc: bloat

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1316 bytes --]

I agree! but I don't want to rush. What latency should substitute? average?
median? latency during upload? download? both? should it be the excess over
idle ping, expressed as a multiplier? an absolute value?

Most people as in 98% of people who use this test do so without any
reference to instructions the forums or anything else and all of them
"expect" to see latency
pings that are similar to speedtest.net measure of how close the speed test
server is.

And I haven't even sorted out the latency bugs. I just now asked the nginx
development list why IE11 has problems doing http pings because it does
a weird two-step of high-normal-high-normal, but when talking to nginx only!
it behaves ok when talking to google.com.

There is a jsfiddle you can play with to see the problem (I hope!)
   http://jsfiddle.net/qe44nbwh/
change nginx.org to google.com, using IE11. (other browsers work fine)

On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:23 AM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:

> http://dfkrkqaqb1zsx.cloudfront.net/speedtest/cdn/377727.png
>
> is showing the base latency without load. It would be more effective
> if it showed the
> latency with load.
>
> --
> Dave Täht
> Open Networking needs **Open Source Hardware**
>
> https://plus.google.com/u/0/+EricRaymond/posts/JqxCe2pFr67
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2232 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bloat] the dslreports png
  2015-04-28 15:22 ` jb
@ 2015-04-28 20:21   ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
  2015-04-28 20:24   ` David Lang
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen @ 2015-04-28 20:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: jb; +Cc: bloat

jb <justin@dslr.net> writes:

> I agree! but I don't want to rush. What latency should substitute? average?
> median? latency during upload? download? both? should it be the excess over
> idle ping, expressed as a multiplier? an absolute value?

A range? So keep the base ping, but add a "bloat" value underneath it
(colour-coded as appropriate)?

-Toke

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bloat] the dslreports png
  2015-04-28 15:22 ` jb
  2015-04-28 20:21   ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
@ 2015-04-28 20:24   ` David Lang
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: David Lang @ 2015-04-28 20:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: jb; +Cc: bloat

[-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/Plain, Size: 1601 bytes --]

On Wed, 29 Apr 2015, jb wrote:

> I agree! but I don't want to rush. What latency should substitute? average?
> median? latency during upload? download? both? should it be the excess over
> idle ping, expressed as a multiplier? an absolute value?

an absolute value of excess over idle (see the other discussion about jitter)

median +- range would be ideal as that could cover both upload and download

> Most people as in 98% of people who use this test do so without any
> reference to instructions the forums or anything else and all of them
> "expect" to see latency
> pings that are similar to speedtest.net measure of how close the speed test
> server is.

In this case, we need something like:

latency
base + value[+-] loaded

David Lang

> And I haven't even sorted out the latency bugs. I just now asked the nginx
> development list why IE11 has problems doing http pings because it does
> a weird two-step of high-normal-high-normal, but when talking to nginx only!
> it behaves ok when talking to google.com.
>
> There is a jsfiddle you can play with to see the problem (I hope!)
>   http://jsfiddle.net/qe44nbwh/
> change nginx.org to google.com, using IE11. (other browsers work fine)
>
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:23 AM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> http://dfkrkqaqb1zsx.cloudfront.net/speedtest/cdn/377727.png
>>
>> is showing the base latency without load. It would be more effective
>> if it showed the
>> latency with load.
>>
>> --
>> Dave Täht
>> Open Networking needs **Open Source Hardware**
>>
>> https://plus.google.com/u/0/+EricRaymond/posts/JqxCe2pFr67
>>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 140 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Bloat mailing list
Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-04-28 20:24 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-04-28 14:23 [Bloat] the dslreports png Dave Taht
2015-04-28 15:22 ` jb
2015-04-28 20:21   ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2015-04-28 20:24   ` David Lang

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox