From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <toke@toke.dk>
Received: from mail2.tohojo.dk (mail2.tohojo.dk [77.235.48.147])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C68821F1B1
	for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 13:22:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail2.tohojo.dk
Sender: toke@toke.dk
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=toke.dk; s=201310;
	t=1430252516; bh=QOGuJrz5K6XTi3dgIlML6AbSmThLqGmqBRgQbJC95XU=;
	h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To;
	b=lF2BdolfvzJmSvTmjbE6crY5oxDHSYCTmgIHtOry2FoMslV4v/GR042iYfKbwSahy
	blXulqA9rpwP7ZbXkke5Zrv0a+AxCn981VQdgjGJpfYrszYSaoAAUj+Y/++heiKfop
	mykDLD+8uHPhz3aycP1VI/IlQKsFBUme+u4z4wjE=
Received: by alrua-karlstad.karlstad.toke.dk (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 7F77933314B; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 22:21:55 +0200 (CEST)
From: =?utf-8?Q?Toke_H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= <toke@toke.dk>
To: jb <justin@dslr.net>
References: <CAA93jw5TUQJX47_52zjoR3Y9ZM9SnMuazECzq0aWXMphScbP-w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAH3Ss94V1eA4io4H1aYb0RUmOmzHwuwg9aT_TeBg+dAyNuF5Gw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 22:21:55 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CAH3Ss94V1eA4io4H1aYb0RUmOmzHwuwg9aT_TeBg+dAyNuF5Gw@mail.gmail.com>
	(jb's message of "Wed, 29 Apr 2015 01:22:17 +1000")
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
Message-ID: <87oam8gg0s.fsf@toke.dk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Cc: bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Bloat] the dslreports png
X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat <bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/bloat>,
	<mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat>
List-Post: <mailto:bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat>,
	<mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 20:22:45 -0000

jb <justin@dslr.net> writes:

> I agree! but I don't want to rush. What latency should substitute? average?
> median? latency during upload? download? both? should it be the excess over
> idle ping, expressed as a multiplier? an absolute value?

A range? So keep the base ping, but add a "bloat" value underneath it
(colour-coded as appropriate)?

-Toke