From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@toke.dk>
To: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@unimore.it>
Cc: bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Bloat] bufferbloat effects on throughput
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 14:13:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87pp6p22ho.fsf@toke.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2B5B39C9-A33D-46ED-84C6-56F237284B21@unimore.it> (Paolo Valente's message of "Mon, 27 Apr 2015 14:01:24 +0200")
Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@unimore.it> writes:
> Thanks. So, if I understood correctly, average throughput may or may
> not be affected, but large throughput fluctuations will always occur
> in the presence of bufferbloat.
I'm always wary of saying 'always', but I'd hazard an 'often' ;)
> Sorry for my usual refrain, but … any pointers to tests, results,
> papers and the like?
Hmm, not sure if there's any papers dealing specifically with this.
However, it's quite easy to provoke this behaviour. Compare, for
instance,
http://files.toke.dk/bufferbloat/rrul-pfifo_fast-all_scaled.pdf
with
http://files.toke.dk/bufferbloat/rrul-fq_codel-all_scaled.pdf
The two top graphs on each are throughput (download and upload
respectively).
For the aggregate behaviour, I had some data on that in my presentation
at the IETF in Hawaii:
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/91/slides/slides-91-iccrg-4.pdf
-Toke
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-27 12:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-27 8:59 Paolo Valente
2015-04-27 9:20 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2015-04-27 12:01 ` Paolo Valente
2015-04-27 12:13 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [this message]
2015-04-27 12:45 ` Paolo Valente
2015-04-27 13:01 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2015-04-27 14:19 ` Bill Ver Steeg (versteb)
2015-04-27 17:28 ` Dave Taht
2015-04-27 19:51 ` Bill Ver Steeg (versteb)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87pp6p22ho.fsf@toke.dk \
--to=toke@toke.dk \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=paolo.valente@unimore.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox