From: d@taht.net (Dave Täht)
To: Jesper Louis Andersen <jesper.louis.andersen@gmail.com>
Cc: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Bloat] Background Bufferbloat Detector
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 16:51:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r5b7iln8.fsf@cruithne.co.teklibre.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimtgd7r8V3m7n9QfFG9q1aLn5dqrzsNCN=a0LhX@mail.gmail.com> (Jesper Louis Andersen's message of "Thu, 17 Feb 2011 00:34:39 +0100")
Jesper Louis Andersen <jesper.louis.andersen@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 20:03, Richard Scheffenegger <rscheff@gmx.at> wrote:
>>
>> Perhaps Bittorrent Clients can be used to export the one-way delay, as
>> measured by the µTP protocol, to build an complementary background
>> bufferbloat detector [..]
>>
>> And, hosting legal content on one's own Bittorrent Client should provide
>> ample opportunity to get decent measurements, without the need to negotiate
>> with someone else about taking readings off some debug-log from an NTP
>> server....
>>
>
> The only "slight" problem is that not all clients support µTP. You are
> limited to hacking either KTorrent 4.0+ (C++) or Vuze (Java). There
> are C clients in progression however (Transmission, libtorrent). My
> "own" client (in Erlang) has been putting off the implementation,
> mostly because I'd rather see TCP fixed :) But perhaps this could be a
> good opportunity to just hack up that protocol :)
>
> BitTorrent also has the advantage that it often connects to hosts from
> all over the world, so if there is any indication in the data, it
> should definitely be able to see a trend.
This is one of the coolest applications of bittorrent technology I've
ever heard of.
I was basically going through /etc/services, and /etc/protocols while
thinking about this.
I thought DNS might be an answer but it didn't contain enough
information... Snmp data contains a MIB that ostensibly reports on queue
size, but no time related info...
I only got as far as port 123 (NTP) which thus far seems a win. The
progress over on comp.protocols.time.ntp is also promising...
A problem in using bittorrent is in reporting, in that a bufferbloat
detecting torrent client or server would have to phone home somehow. On
the other hand, that could also be interestingly anonymized[1]
/me girds up to get through the remaining protocols - I am stopped at
port 179 right now, thinking hard....
--
Dave Taht
http://nex-6.taht.net
1: (Bt the solution is too long to fit into the margins of this email)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-16 23:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-16 17:46 Sean Conner
2011-02-16 18:48 ` Dave Täht
2011-02-16 19:03 ` Richard Scheffenegger
2011-02-16 23:34 ` Jesper Louis Andersen
2011-02-16 23:39 ` Juliusz Chroboczek
2011-02-16 23:51 ` Dave Täht [this message]
2011-02-18 20:08 ` Richard Scheffenegger
2011-02-18 20:17 ` Dave Täht
2011-02-18 21:27 ` Juliusz Chroboczek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87r5b7iln8.fsf@cruithne.co.teklibre.org \
--to=d@taht.net \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=jesper.louis.andersen@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox