From: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr>
To: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
Cc: bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: [Bloat] Re: 'Does our “need for speed” make our Wi-Fi suck?' (from orb.net)
Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2025 15:47:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87sefoz0yx.wl-jch@irif.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADVnQy=MfVieYWQoOwJFZWEPHWjU1XWJgVhx7dYPYkq81awnXA@mail.gmail.com>
> Their answer: 'Yep.'
Yeah, I've read the article.
Their argument is that we should be using lower bandwidths in urban
environments in order to avoid interference with neighbouring networks.
That was perhaps true with 802.11g, but I'm not sure it's still true with
802.11be, with OFDMA, preamble punching and other fun techniques.
Benchmarks, or it didn't happen.
-- Juliusz
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-12 13:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-11 13:54 [Bloat] " Neal Cardwell
2025-10-12 13:47 ` Juliusz Chroboczek [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87sefoz0yx.wl-jch@irif.fr \
--to=jch@irif.fr \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=ncardwell@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox