* [Bloat] 'Does our “need for speed” make our Wi-Fi suck?' (from orb.net)
@ 2025-10-11 13:54 Neal Cardwell
2025-10-12 13:47 ` [Bloat] " Juliusz Chroboczek
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Neal Cardwell @ 2025-10-11 13:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bloat
Their answer: 'Yep.'
https://orb.net/blog/does-speed-make-wifi-suck
cheers,
neal
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [Bloat] Re: 'Does our “need for speed” make our Wi-Fi suck?' (from orb.net)
2025-10-11 13:54 [Bloat] 'Does our “need for speed” make our Wi-Fi suck?' (from orb.net) Neal Cardwell
@ 2025-10-12 13:47 ` Juliusz Chroboczek
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Juliusz Chroboczek @ 2025-10-12 13:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Neal Cardwell; +Cc: bloat
> Their answer: 'Yep.'
Yeah, I've read the article.
Their argument is that we should be using lower bandwidths in urban
environments in order to avoid interference with neighbouring networks.
That was perhaps true with 802.11g, but I'm not sure it's still true with
802.11be, with OFDMA, preamble punching and other fun techniques.
Benchmarks, or it didn't happen.
-- Juliusz
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-10-12 13:47 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-10-11 13:54 [Bloat] 'Does our “need for speed” make our Wi-Fi suck?' (from orb.net) Neal Cardwell
2025-10-12 13:47 ` [Bloat] " Juliusz Chroboczek
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox