From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.taht.net (mail.taht.net [IPv6:2a01:7e00::f03c:91ff:feae:7028]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B96D3CB3B for ; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 22:44:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from dancer.taht.net (unknown [IPv6:2603:3024:1536:86f0:eea8:6bff:fefe:9a2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.taht.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 39F7321461; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 03:44:51 +0000 (UTC) From: Dave Taht To: David Lang Cc: Mikael Abrahamsson , bloat References: Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 19:44:38 -0800 In-Reply-To: (David Lang's message of "Wed, 14 Nov 2018 16:56:10 -0800 (PST)") Message-ID: <87sh03dmxl.fsf@taht.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Bloat] one benefit of turning off shaping + fq_codel X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 03:44:53 -0000 David Lang writes: > On Wed, 14 Nov 2018, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: > >> On Tue, 13 Nov 2018, Dave Taht wrote: >> >>> It turns out we are contributing to global warming. >>> >>> >> https://community.ubnt.com/t5/UniFi-Routing-Switching/USG-temperature/m-p/2547046/highlight/true#M115060 > > so how much power is wasted in re-transmitting packets due to bloat? That might be a good way to look at it also. It seems possible to make the calculation in time for midnight of march 31st. > _______________________________________________ > Bloat mailing list > Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat