From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from korolev.univ-paris7.fr (korolev.univ-paris7.fr [IPv6:2001:660:3301:8000::1:2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67D4321F1EF for ; Sun, 8 Dec 2013 09:56:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr [81.194.30.253]) by korolev.univ-paris7.fr (8.14.4/8.14.4/relay1/46573) with ESMTP id rB8HuMgs016056; Sun, 8 Dec 2013 18:56:22 +0100 Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2779D6D5E1; Sun, 8 Dec 2013 18:56:22 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at math.univ-paris-diderot.fr Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10023) with ESMTP id APR2cin5GAgc; Sun, 8 Dec 2013 18:56:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from pirx.pps.jussieu.fr (unknown [78.194.40.74]) (Authenticated sender: jch) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D1F326D590; Sun, 8 Dec 2013 18:56:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=pirx.pps.jussieu.fr) by pirx.pps.jussieu.fr with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vpiao-0001nJ-E7; Sun, 08 Dec 2013 18:56:34 +0100 Date: Sun, 08 Dec 2013 18:56:34 +0100 Message-ID: <87txejb50t.wl%jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> From: Juliusz Chroboczek To: Dave Taht In-Reply-To: References: <20131203222559.GV8066@einstein.kenyonralph.com> <7ieh5pew2d.wl%jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <87haakx1ev.wl%jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <20131208012751.GA6382@sesse.net> <878uvvcwqh.wl%jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (korolev.univ-paris7.fr [194.254.61.138]); Sun, 08 Dec 2013 18:56:22 +0100 (CET) X-Miltered: at korolev with ID 52A4B2C6.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http : // j-chkmail dot ensmp dot fr)! X-j-chkmail-Enveloppe: 52A4B2C6.000 from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/null/mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/ X-j-chkmail-Score: MSGID : 52A4B2C6.000 on korolev.univ-paris7.fr : j-chkmail score : . : R=. U=. O=. B=0.000 -> S=0.000 X-j-chkmail-Status: Ham Cc: bloat Subject: Re: [Bloat] curious..... X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Dec 2013 17:56:24 -0000 > > I think that the WNDR3800 should be able to push a gigabit, even with NAT. > > No, it tops out at about 330Mbit/sec currently with no firewall rules, > no nat. Full-size frames? That sucks. (And thanks for the hard data.) > No. aqm-scripts can't push 110KB/sec through *HTB*. Typo? > The rate limiter is the biggest cpu pig in the system. Have you spoken to Dumazet about that? > What I was thinking about was taking the 3 tier structure of the > current aqm-scripts system, turning it into something more drr-like > and adding support for rate limiting directly to it (Nods.) > Notably it seems few have internalized what the "sparse stream" > optimization does for things like voip. We're waiting with held breath until you care to enlighten us ;-) -- Juliusz