From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.taht.net (mail.taht.net [IPv6:2a01:7e00::f03c:91ff:feae:7028]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 373843B2A4 for ; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 10:27:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from dancer.taht.net (unknown [IPv6:2603:3024:1536:86f0:eea8:6bff:fefe:9a2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.taht.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 861EB220EF; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 15:27:02 +0000 (UTC) From: Dave Taht To: Mikael Abrahamsson Cc: Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net References: Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 07:26:50 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Mikael Abrahamsson's message of "Mon, 12 Nov 2018 07:53:49 +0100 (CET)") Message-ID: <87va529v0l.fsf@taht.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Bloat] excellent result with OpenWrt 18.06.1 + CAKE on FTTH X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 15:27:04 -0000 Mikael Abrahamsson writes: > Hi, > > I am running "stock" OpenWrt 18.06.1 on an WRT1200AC with > CAKE+piece_of_cake.qos and set to 250 down 100 up. This is on an > ethernet point-to-point FTTH connection in Stockholm, > Sweden. Basically just installed OpenWrt and then added the > sqm-scripts-extra and luci-app-sqm packages, went in and configured > the correct settings in the web UI, and then everything was great. > > Biggest benefit with this FTTH setup is that I don't have to > experience the first-hop sceduler I had with my previous DOCSIS > connection (that also sometimes didn't do advertised bandwidth so I > ended up getting 10-30ms of bufferbloat). > > http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/41682104 > > The smokeping screenshots below show the difference between DOCSIS and > FTTH scheduler, but the much lower access RTT (1-2 ms ) and the lower > PDV (which seems to be several ms on DOCSIS but not on my P2P FTTH). > > https://imgur.com/a/96dFdho > > Thanks everybody for the excellent packaging and ease of use for end > users to get this to work. I've had this running now for 40 days > without any issue. After running a few days... (I imagine you've restarted cake a few times) tc -s qdisc show dev your_device? tc -s qdisc show dev your_ifbdevice?