From: d@taht.net (Dave Täht)
To: Eric Raymond <esr@snark.thyrsus.com>
Cc: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Bloat] Letter to CACM?
Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2011 09:14:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87vd0xf8cw.fsf@cruithne.co.teklibre.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110206154236.64AF720C22E@snark.thyrsus.com> (Eric Raymond's message of "Sun, 6 Feb 2011 10:42:36 -0500 (EST)")
Eric Raymond <esr@snark.thyrsus.com> writes:
>
> They had a useful suggestion. They think we ought to ship the overview
> as a letter to CACM. "Everybody gets that," they pointed out.
I don't but paper had a hard way of getting to me for the last 4 years.
> Yeah, I can see it. Getty, J., Raymond, E.S., Taht, D. "Packet Loss
> Considered Helpful" OK, I kid about the title.
I think the title is expressive, snarky, revolutionary, chock full of
wonderful historical references, and people will "get it".
:)
I do feel that focusing on the desirability of packet loss, alone, would
have a marvelously focusing effect on a letter.
The wireless side is a quagmire that I hope to get to writing about
semi-coherently today.
> Should I put this shipping to CACM my to-do list for when the overview
> is done? Jim, especially looking for your judgment; you'd be the
> obvious designee for lead author even if the alphabetical order didn't
> fall that way.
How to crack the economist?
--
Dave Taht
http://nex-6.taht.net
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-06 16:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-06 15:42 Eric Raymond
2011-02-06 16:14 ` Dave Täht [this message]
2011-02-06 16:15 ` Jim Gettys
2011-02-07 10:15 ` Simon Leinen
2011-02-07 17:45 ` Jim Gettys
2011-02-13 16:27 ` Simon Leinen
2011-02-08 0:51 Alex Burr
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87vd0xf8cw.fsf@cruithne.co.teklibre.org \
--to=d@taht.net \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=esr@snark.thyrsus.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox