From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <toke@toke.dk>
Received: from mail.toke.dk (mail.toke.dk [52.28.52.200])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21B8F3BA8E
 for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 16:05:33 -0500 (EST)
From: Toke =?utf-8?Q?H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= <toke@toke.dk>
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=toke.dk; s=20161023;
 t=1543352731; bh=c9IE0Smoiq7TYgsmtyjxWsF+InmRv1MEzp/zyGqVMRw=;
 h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From;
 b=L3y3T7L00unsbcbGkWT2zsYEWbZAWwP9BGPHpFHriwypbIPKSa70Kx4VsiP9IM9RG
 TWqHF5mmZKPtgrqdALF9H7auSMDZv3fWZt3tTiq+/eTzay80ZI/2NIfDgsvA+zT6XL
 Nmr7mr+N1dVUmaB8cYQsabKL7CT/M3akQw2e1bbHvMBYEAuOoaLflUiC2e53G5ZkdG
 RgahLjfc1KGD81Fpi5+Yp3V7wAoWk7FNNuncoa89JIXkg1NipHnO7ovLA1CArno6I8
 79cRfONUCydC9+Ac9G9KsLtBVS2rcNxbBqHb4SxmhjhnOsU1/FAUK2eKKsPbBR5R5D
 EYLiqLSz7RRTA==
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Cc: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>, bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw6J7xERVrQ1Hiwh5P-jZGmEe-ztxcQ+sHdjbmy6+xT9Bg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <65EAC6C1-4688-46B6-A575-A6C7F2C066C5@heistp.net>
 <CADVnQymdAUgHQ81TdrohY-EeLBOyR6_hdpVKHm+VXgis4UNQxg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAA93jw5WWeE-LYNurfv2zYcn73fdUTa3anWpkhg=29XEWpjOEA@mail.gmail.com>
 <874lc2w89s.fsf@toke.dk>
 <CAA93jw6J7xERVrQ1Hiwh5P-jZGmEe-ztxcQ+sHdjbmy6+xT9Bg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 22:05:31 +0100
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
Message-ID: <87y39eut7o.fsf@toke.dk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [Bloat] when does the CoDel part of fq_codel help in the real
	world?
X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat <bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/bloat>,
 <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat>
List-Post: <mailto:bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat>,
 <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 21:05:33 -0000

Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> writes:

> On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 12:54 PM Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen <toke@t=
oke.dk> wrote:
>>
>> Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> > I've done things like measure induced latency on wireguard streams of
>> > late and codel keeps it sane. still, wireguard internally is optimized
>> > for single flow "dragster" performance, and I'd like it to gain the
>> > same fq_codel optimization that did such nice things for multiple
>> > flows terminating on the router for ipsec. The before/after on that
>> > was marvelous.
>>
>> This is on my list, FWIW :)
>
> Your queue overfloweth. And as good as you are at FQ-ing yourself, I
> so dearly would like the !@#!@#@! wifi patches to land in 4.20.

Well, 4.20 is already in RC, so that is not going to happen ;)

-Toke