From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.taht.net (mail.taht.net [IPv6:2a01:7e00::f03c:91ff:feae:7028]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DF5A3B29E for ; Wed, 20 Sep 2017 22:34:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nemesis.taht.net (unknown [IPv6:2603:3024:1536:86f0:2e0:4cff:fec1:1206]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.taht.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B81002144A; Thu, 21 Sep 2017 02:34:44 +0000 (UTC) From: Dave Taht To: Aaron Wood Cc: bloat References: Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 19:34:42 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Aaron Wood's message of "Tue, 29 Aug 2017 22:15:40 -0700") Message-ID: <87y3p8g4ot.fsf@nemesis.taht.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Bloat] different speeds on different ports? (benchmarking fun) X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 02:34:46 -0000 A packet capture from dslreports might be useful also.