From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail2.tohojo.dk (mail2.tohojo.dk [77.235.48.147]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC92D21F5AC for ; Sat, 18 Apr 2015 05:34:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail2.tohojo.dk Sender: toke@toke.dk DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=toke.dk; s=201310; t=1429360439; bh=j+Ha6+9qLeWivS+v5Y0d+oSkQF0GDoTll1fayJP3ohk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=KW+FMxJnUXSCPOrNTITVoAkFqbmw5mSMN05kxGth+Kc1KyaBA0LOi4jUebJRMtg1a rAxTJoPFdKIHseRZkpaD0e5sw/adq96KXaBwz2gGFaC+6TcKrtm9IJMJcMeUGCKaTy mprE0MJQsIim1mKKLtlNv7seT1VtiNP3lwsT9zjg= Received: by alrua-karlstad.karlstad.toke.dk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B8E8A31E4E4; Sat, 18 Apr 2015 14:33:58 +0200 (CEST) From: =?utf-8?Q?Toke_H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= To: "Eggert\, Lars" References: <880D8FBB-3C10-451D-8EB5-50D0A65B9704@netapp.com> Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2015 14:33:58 +0200 In-Reply-To: <880D8FBB-3C10-451D-8EB5-50D0A65B9704@netapp.com> (Lars Eggert's message of "Fri, 17 Apr 2015 14:45:58 +0000") X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Message-ID: <87y4lplio9.fsf@toke.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: bloat Subject: Re: [Bloat] RRUL for netperf (bad hack) X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2015 12:34:36 -0000 "Eggert, Lars" writes: > (I was interested in the delay an application sees on top of a TCP > stream, which is not something Toke's excellent netperf-wrapper tool > can currently do, AFAIK.) You're quite right. If a version of this makes it upstream in netperf, I'm quite happy to add in a parser for it so it can be used with the other tests in netperf-wrapper :) -Toke