From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <moeller0@gmx.de>
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.22])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client CN "mout.gmx.net",
	Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94E8C21F43C
	for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 12:40:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hms-beagle.home.lan ([87.164.165.7]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101)
	with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Ll0tl-1ZIQU41jin-00ajjI;
	Sun, 19 Apr 2015 21:40:37 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <B96B1C8A-DA22-406F-8C2F-052931320FF2@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 21:40:36 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <8E4F61CA-4274-4414-B4C0-F582167D66D6@gmx.de>
References: <CAH3Ss97f2AY3nB2Lo07h18pmm8yDn9EYw7=ZjRKZRTg66DUEAw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA5684DF-3492-4BED-9AD0-168CEF999DF4@gmx.de>
	<75C1DDFF-FBD2-4825-A167-92DFCF6A7713@gmail.com>
	<8AD4493E-EA21-496D-923D-B4257B078A1C@gmx.de>
	<B96B1C8A-DA22-406F-8C2F-052931320FF2@gmail.com>
To: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:aU4JZnktcts5srM7njvmIJKEUUmk1zXGL9mg+feUGt+2FPHngff
	OerRUsHhWrB1ArV/QVbHynJp9IQFDzDPpSYMTyXHQUIeBis2V35jeaIIBMseSELA9mmrGmT
	SnUghZqLoW4M2yVuHQgv4rQU/xhRxT+gsYK4a/6AVOAjDCfXUJ6jglxXXa/opUN9PxaEW++
	3+YVYsk48sLOtuHgSue4w==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;
Cc: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Bloat] DSLReports Speed Test has latency measurement built-in
X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat <bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/bloat>,
	<mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat>
List-Post: <mailto:bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat>,
	<mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 19:41:13 -0000

Hi Jonathan,

On Apr 19, 2015, at 19:41 , Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com> =
wrote:

>=20
>> On 19 Apr, 2015, at 19:30, Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de> wrote:
>>=20
>>> Frequency readouts are probably more accessible to the latter.
>>=20
>> 	The frequency domain more accessible to laypersons? I have my =
doubts ;)
>=20
> Gamers, at least, are familiar with =93frames per second=94 and how =
that corresponds to their monitor=92s refresh rate. =20

	I am sure they can easily transform back into time domain to get =
the frame period ;) .  I am partly kidding, I think your idea is great =
in that it is a truly positive value which could lend itself to being =
used in ISP/router manufacturer advertising, and hence might work in the =
real work; on the other hand I like to keep data as =93raw=94 as =
possible (not that ^(-1) is a transformation worthy of being called data =
massage).

> The desirable range of latencies, when converted to Hz, happens to be =
roughly the same as the range of desirable frame rates.

	Just to play devils advocate, the interesting part is time or =
saving time so seconds or milliseconds are also intuitively =
understandable and can be easily added ;)

Best Regards
	Sebastian

>=20
> - Jonathan Morton
>=20