From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lb0-x231.google.com (mail-lb0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9297521F2E8 for ; Thu, 21 May 2015 17:56:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by lbbzk7 with SMTP id zk7so2469305lbb.0 for ; Thu, 21 May 2015 17:56:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=ZHXo3IqC9vKkIkRcfUcjf86NzExiTin0Cx4VC8/giNg=; b=STxq3qLOzNTi7gkgMfJQbAms6YEJrVvVfNBGni7ELvHF2tXSHXDtAKLZ8lRU3yWAQ+ GspNaLxprmiVdWjud6yq4Ae2GQ01Q7iZMzMm4C68dAtl6DEw448/AGBbdNoJmhjiqrV4 K/C43+YTUgfw0/cA0cJtFgi9w7kqgqD5ogOr/cFJtUpb/LwCLJgFmT1jyAWzJywD5zv0 Cwfgwwrn2K2SbOhMfPX/nYdEgBMsYvX9GW/WJsvWJqrQdapksobQI//T+frf1jRxbhGO Hp2ZdBpZvqUNh6aPADntMZtH+E0atLQ1B9ZV3yZ+JMTHDBVbB4/IzJd6SzEP3YAqahoJ H00Q== X-Received: by 10.152.22.34 with SMTP id a2mr4418390laf.59.1432256201792; Thu, 21 May 2015 17:56:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bass.home.chromatix.fi (87-95-2-222.bb.dnainternet.fi. [87.95.2.222]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id cq3sm119674lad.14.2015.05.21.17.56.39 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 21 May 2015 17:56:40 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2098\)) From: Jonathan Morton In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 03:56:35 +0300 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <8FFDE0DF-0F5A-4A3F-A47B-F8D59EEC7971@gmail.com> References: <58264BE0-CDBE-4739-B03D-4BAA20B13997@gmail.com> To: jb X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2098) Cc: bloat Subject: Re: [Bloat] dslreports mockup X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 00:57:14 -0000 > On 22 May, 2015, at 03:17, jb wrote: >=20 > Or I can just have two Y-Axis with auto-scaling on both. You could also try a square-root scale (as opposed to linear or = logarithmic). This should help with comparing data with different = orders of magnitude, without flattening things as aggressively as a log = scale. But perhaps we should see what it looks like before committing to it. - Jonathan Morton