From: Pete Heist <pete@heistp.net>
To: Dave Taht <dave@taht.net>
Cc: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>,
ECN-Sane <ecn-sane@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Bloat] [Ecn-sane] sce materials from ietf
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2019 10:57:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <92AFD3DE-A8A3-4CA2-8BFB-CFB5E446524A@heistp.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87lfrvl22k.fsf@taht.net>
> On Dec 2, 2019, at 6:38 AM, Dave Taht <dave@taht.net> wrote:
>
> I do hate watching y'all continually concede the "latency" point and
> have to argue on the "chosen ground" of single or dualq about
> long-running tcp flows.
I don’t think we’ve conceded that. It would be possible to run more tests on a LAN with a shorter Codel interval and show ~1ms TCP RTT, and perhaps we should. I don’t think there's any fundamental reason why one signaling mechanism or the other should ultimately be any better in this regard.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-02 9:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-29 20:08 [Bloat] " Dave Taht
2019-11-29 21:20 ` Jonathan Morton
2019-11-29 23:10 ` alex.burr
2019-11-30 1:39 ` Jonathan Morton
2019-11-30 7:27 ` [Bloat] [Ecn-sane] " Sebastian Moeller
2019-11-30 14:32 ` Jonathan Morton
2019-11-30 15:42 ` Sebastian Moeller
2019-11-30 17:11 ` Jonathan Morton
2019-12-02 5:38 ` Dave Taht
2019-12-02 7:54 ` Sebastian Moeller
2019-12-02 9:57 ` Pete Heist [this message]
2019-11-30 22:17 ` Carsten Bormann
2019-11-30 22:23 ` Jonathan Morton
2019-12-01 16:35 ` Sebastian Moeller
2019-12-01 16:54 ` Jonathan Morton
2019-12-01 19:03 ` Sebastian Moeller
2019-12-01 19:27 ` Jonathan Morton
2019-12-01 19:32 ` Sebastian Moeller
2019-12-01 20:30 ` Jonathan Morton
2019-12-01 17:30 ` Rodney W. Grimes
2019-12-01 19:17 ` Sebastian Moeller
2019-12-02 5:10 ` Dave Taht
2019-12-02 7:18 ` Sebastian Moeller
2019-12-01 18:06 ` David Collier-Brown
2019-11-29 22:55 ` Rodney W. Grimes
2019-11-29 22:58 ` Rodney W. Grimes
2019-11-30 2:37 ` [Bloat] " Dave Taht
2019-11-30 3:10 ` [Bloat] [Ecn-sane] " Rodney W. Grimes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=92AFD3DE-A8A3-4CA2-8BFB-CFB5E446524A@heistp.net \
--to=pete@heistp.net \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=chromatix99@gmail.com \
--cc=dave@taht.net \
--cc=ecn-sane@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox