From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3::184]) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD8E821F20A for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 17:24:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 077C120260; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 21:35:35 -0400 (EDT) From: Michael Richardson To: Stephen Hemminger In-Reply-To: <20131030162534.29f34ada@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> References: <20131030162534.29f34ada@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> X-Mailer: MH-E 8.2; nmh 1.5; GNU Emacs 23.4.1 X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m Cc: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Bloat] T-Mobile LTE buffer bloat X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 00:24:18 -0000 I agree with others that the image rewriting/compression is likely a network "service". What about the other ports and things? I wonder if the image rewriting causes additional bloat... -- ] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [ ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network architect [ ] mcr@sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [