From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-la0-x231.google.com (mail-la0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6711A21F14B for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 07:18:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by labe2 with SMTP id e2so106092146lab.3 for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 07:18:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=U0r6xqBcIeKGsZ/ATuQfFCNRa4Kl4WXoGqc49LZuXvg=; b=GalOukLWTxV2ovtgGFHGR//kiPtpAE6k7wxMGWzC2rVCtC1ZUNdWbDXIieBTlVABp5 c3sB+cQJ06ahARrZQtHm2apqrs/aIZ7Tf2ciflbC21+d09Zk6AJmc6hDiWVtTPun1bH7 MNckAqCdEHKhlEFJKfdoHnKaaI0SV7MvQD8tlmYgEuWdY1npdoV2S3q6HPpgsIvVIt0f G/AJzyKbD33dCZZ1UuMjlJPD7JXzjA7xPJ9wzM0FZsFB1UxeMpFyyP78HNdmWqjJyw8s 4Z77y+oasEeJdntUClr6wu4x3ztKorHkFIm2jk/A6uROI+YdlMqLtkrejQmMnHWV1vEh HW5Q== X-Received: by 10.112.190.69 with SMTP id go5mr5545918lbc.74.1427725087502; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 07:18:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bass.home.chromatix.fi (87-95-163-98.bb.dnainternet.fi. [87.95.163.98]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id kv10sm2029724lac.23.2015.03.30.07.18.05 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 30 Mar 2015 07:18:06 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\)) From: Jonathan Morton In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 17:18:03 +0300 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <95B0F8DA-7650-4064-BEE6-F0CDF936D33A@gmail.com> References: <20150316203532.05BD21E2@taggart.lackof.org> <123130.1426635142@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <15A0911A-E3B7-440A-A26B-C5E1489EA98B@viagenie.ca> <1426773234.362612992@apps.rackspace.com> <1426796961.194223197@apps.rackspace.com> <5FD20B4A-A7E8-48C0-89F9-E2EB86DED8A6@gmail.com> <755FC1BE-141C-42FD-B3E3-564488982665@gmail.com> To: Pedro Tumusok X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6) Cc: "dpreed@reed.com" , bloat Subject: Re: [Bloat] Latency Measurements in Speed Test suites (was: DOCSIS 3+ recommendation?) X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 14:18:40 -0000 > On 30 Mar, 2015, at 16:56, Pedro Tumusok = wrote: >=20 > Also would you mind doing another test and share the link for result, = so he can check closer? I still have the result link for the earlier one: http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/193440 Here=E2=80=99s another result without using the webcache, but keeping = everything else the same: http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/199524 For context, this is through the PowerBook which is running cake, 8Mbps = down and 1Mbps up. This is somewhat less than the capacity of the link, = but since it=E2=80=99s 3G it varies quite a lot anyway. > on the other things, yes I'd like to hear about buffer bloat ideas. The number-one desirable feature is to carry on measuring the latency = while the throughput test is ongoing. This is relevant to anyone who = wants to make a VoIP call or play an online game while using the = connection for something else. If you have several people in one = household, it=E2=80=99s often hard to coordinate their activity to avoid = such multitasking. - Jonathan Morton