From: David Lang <david@lang.hm>
To: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>
Cc: sascha@thexlab.org,
"Network Neutrality is back! Let´s make the technical aspects
heard this time!" <nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
"Michael Welzl" <michawe@ifi.uio.no>,
"Frantisek Borsik" <frantisek.borsik@gmail.com>,
"Dave Taht via Starlink" <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
"Cake List" <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
libreqos <libreqos@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
"Jeremy Austin via Rpm" <rpm@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: [Bloat] Re: [NNagain] The French have decided to destroy the Internet within their own country by taxing Gigabits (Dr. Peering)
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2026 12:14:05 -0700 (MST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <97sos3pq-n209-nr88-ops7-24qn6n06n5q0@ynat.uz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D16900C7-4EDA-4A9D-A8B7-97B2C1A1B60A@gmx.de>
Sebastian Moeller via Bloat wrote:
>> In essence, someone in France could VPN to a different country; neither the ISP or the VPN provider would know the specific content being accessed
>
> Indeed, and the law explicitly states that just received bytes for the ISPs customers are to be counted, per ASN and the bill is supposed to be sent to that ASN, independent of whether that ASN is the true source or what kind of data we are talking about... actually the law states that neither destination (the specific enduser) nor content are to be looked at/reported/aggregated.
so if a packet transitions multiple ISPs, each one would generate a bill for the
traffic? what a way to entrench large ISPs
(I may be misunderstanding something)
David Lang
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-04 19:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-31 12:56 [Bloat] The French have decided to destroy the Internet within their own country by taxing Gigabits (Dr. Peering) Frantisek Borsik
2026-10-31 14:51 ` [Bloat] " Sophie
2026-11-02 7:44 ` Michael Welzl
2026-11-02 11:23 ` Sebastian Moeller
2026-11-02 14:30 ` [Bloat] Re: [NNagain] " Sascha Meinrath
2026-11-04 15:40 ` [Bloat] Re: [NNagain] " Sebastian Moeller
2026-11-04 16:20 ` Sascha Meinrath
2026-11-04 17:03 ` Sebastian Moeller
2026-11-04 17:57 ` [Bloat] Re: [Cake] " David P. Reed
2026-11-05 9:05 ` [Bloat] Re: [Cake] " Sebastian Moeller
2026-11-04 18:33 ` [Bloat] " Sascha Meinrath
2026-11-04 19:09 ` Sebastian Moeller
2026-11-04 19:14 ` David Lang [this message]
2026-11-04 19:20 ` Sebastian Moeller
2026-11-04 19:26 ` [Bloat] Re: [NNagain] " Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond
[not found] ` <bf2f7d692a5e42738403850d419c4a94@OS5P279MB0502.NORP279.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
2026-11-02 11:33 ` [Bloat] " Michael Welzl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=97sos3pq-n209-nr88-ops7-24qn6n06n5q0@ynat.uz \
--to=david@lang.hm \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=frantisek.borsik@gmail.com \
--cc=libreqos@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=michawe@ifi.uio.no \
--cc=moeller0@gmx.de \
--cc=nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=rpm@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=sascha@thexlab.org \
--cc=starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox