Re: [Bloat] summarizing the bitag latency report?

[Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1429 bytes --]

My lightning round take:
Politically: it's complicated
Practically: this ain't rocket-science, just deploy competent traffic shaping, competent scheduling (preferably FQ) and competent AQM.

Then you are in a fine spot to wait until the political dust settles.


I admit only having browsed the report and that some time ago... but a single paragraph will always be far from the text.

On 12 November 2022 00:16:43 CET, Dave Taht via Bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
>If you were to try to summarize this *in a paragraph*, what would you say?
>
>https://www.bitag.org/documents/BITAG_latency_explained.pdf
>
>(yes, I helped write this, but squeezing it down to less than 3 pages
>is beyond my capabilities, much less a paragraph, and by the time we
>hit the recommendations section, things had got too political to make
>sane recommendations)
>
>Also QoS, vs QoE. Try to imagine explaining the need to a CFO, or
>congresscritter. Feel free to take more than a paragraph.
>
>
>-- 
>This song goes out to all the folk that thought Stadia would work:
>https://www.linkedin.com/posts/dtaht_the-mushroom-song-activity-6981366665607352320-FXtz
>Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC
>_______________________________________________
>Bloat mailing list
>Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
>https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2021 bytes --]