From: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>
To: "Richard Fröhning" <misanthropos@gmx.de>
Cc: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Bloat] Does it makes sense to shape traffic with 16Kbit/s up and 16Kbit/s down?
Date: Mon, 4 May 2020 16:09:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9FB134D9-B180-4975-A2A4-1840F1232359@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200504142626.1104b959@lake.home.lan>
At 16Kbps a full-MTU sized packet will take around
(1000 ms/sec * (1500 * 8) bits/packet ) / 16000 bits/sec = 750 ms
This is just to put things into perspective, 16Kbps is going to be both painful and much better than no service at all....
> On May 4, 2020, at 14:26, Richard Fröhning <misanthropos@gmx.de> wrote:
>
> And if so, which queue discipline would work best with it?
>
> Background: I am forced to use my cell phone as uplink and after I
> reach the monthly limit, bandwidth will be reduces to given up/downlink
> speeds.
>
> I know Surfing websites with those speeds will take forever - however
> it should be enough to send/receive emails and/or use a messenger.
>
> Richard
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bloat mailing list
> Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-04 14:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-04 12:26 Richard Fröhning
2020-05-04 12:36 ` Jonathan Morton
2020-05-04 14:09 ` Sebastian Moeller [this message]
2020-05-04 14:23 ` Jonathan Morton
2020-05-04 15:47 ` Richard Fröhning
2020-05-04 15:51 ` Jonathan Morton
2020-05-05 7:25 ` Richard Fröhning
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9FB134D9-B180-4975-A2A4-1840F1232359@gmx.de \
--to=moeller0@gmx.de \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=misanthropos@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox