Re: [Bloat] reality2 podcast

[Jonathan Foulkes <jf@jonathanfoulkes.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1531 bytes --]

I’ll note that I defected what seemed to be a bloated line from Doc’s end. Voice quality was nowhere near as good as it could be.

Podcasters should A) use a wired connection for local connections, and B) run a well-tuned AQM on their router.

Running this VoIP quality test would be a good proxy for line latency performance for conference calls (voice only).
https://www.ringcentral.com/support/qos.html <https://www.ringcentral.com/support/qos.html>

Attached are two images of results of that test on two of my lines, both sore the same MOS rating of 4.2.

The first is a cable line with 30MBps of uplink capacity, with an IQrouter Pro.


the second is my backup 10 / 0.7Mbps DSL Line with an IQrouter v3, note how this graph and stats is almost identical to the cable line, some stats are actually better on DSL.



Friends don’t let friends VoIP/Zoom without Cake ;-)

Cheers,

Jonathan

> On Sep 17, 2021, at 2:27 PM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> My nuanced personal tale of the aqm deployment debate, with a
> modest starlink WIP update, and a reference to my fav outcomes of the iab
> workshop, just went up here:
> 
> https://reality2.substack.com/p/improving-the-internets-responsiveness
> 
> 
> -- 
> Fixing Starlink's Latencies: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c9gLo6Xrwgw
> 
> Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC
> _______________________________________________
> Bloat mailing list
> Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat


[-- Attachment #2.1: Type: text/html, Size: 2991 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2.2: VoIPTest_WS35Up_line.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 190658 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2.3: VoIPTest_DSLline.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 188624 bytes --]