General list for discussing Bufferbloat
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bloat] some market observations
@ 2011-03-11 13:22 BeckW
  2011-03-11 19:05 ` Srikanth Sundaresan
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: BeckW @ 2011-03-11 13:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bloat

interesting discussions going on here..

A consumer-oriented magazine complained that a VDSL access rated 50 mbps only delivered 31 mbps. It turned out that they used a single TCP session for their measurements. At those speeds, delay and packet loss determine the maximum throughput, independent of the available bandwidth. The formula in RfC 3819, Section 8.5 yielded an estimate of ~32 mbps for the given delay and loss, which matched nicely the actual measurements.

With increasing access bandwidths, ISPs are forced to look into the delay issues.

DSL bit error rates go up when everybody switches to DSL. DSL standard bodies look into link layer mechanisms to mitigate this, but all solutions add delay. It's hard to find the right balance between delay and packet loss; both hurt TCP performance. As delay can't be controlled by a single ISP, the temptation is high to focus on the bit errors.



Regards,
Wolfgang Beck



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-03-11 19:05 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-03-11 13:22 [Bloat] some market observations BeckW
2011-03-11 19:05 ` Srikanth Sundaresan

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox