From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "rcdn-iport.cisco.com", Issuer "HydrantID SSL ICA G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD15721F5A4 for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 10:04:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=786; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1429290324; x=1430499924; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=bVCoTi+33UNCvUal61dKUdRM0EmIcTf7TCv4oKGuR5Y=; b=GfyAspcvIVjPklagE5RpCgEmF9/ZJOJmparhs5CMpjhThRvQlY3FdjR+ KPbZD+HWDn+44d15wspoDf9vPfTp98u0wY9OCfqqb/E6/L3hVN53+SJyq gJAlndhzszt7/KIvk1WgBD5de5tNv9SwqkGrB/EHFgr29ttVkU75vqDA7 U=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AiBQAYPDFV/4sNJK1dgwyBLgXNeQKBTEwBAQEBAQF+hCABAQEEOj8MBAIBCBEEAQEBChQJBzIUCQgCBA4FCIgjyGwBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEXiymESzEHBoMRgRYBBJEinygiggUZBIFRb4FEgQABAQE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,595,1422921600"; d="scan'208";a="409594407" Received: from alln-core-6.cisco.com ([173.36.13.139]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 17 Apr 2015 17:04:55 +0000 Received: from xhc-rcd-x10.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x10.cisco.com [173.37.183.84]) by alln-core-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t3HH4sbm029791 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 17 Apr 2015 17:04:54 GMT Received: from xmb-aln-x05.cisco.com ([169.254.11.175]) by xhc-rcd-x10.cisco.com ([173.37.183.84]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 12:04:54 -0500 From: "Bill Ver Steeg (versteb)" To: "Eggert, Lars" Thread-Topic: RRUL for netperf (bad hack) Thread-Index: AQHQeR03XD8sxAGfOUKDFaXFrUm+Tp1RYe+AgABZewD//7NToA== Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 17:04:53 +0000 Message-ID: References: <880D8FBB-3C10-451D-8EB5-50D0A65B9704@netapp.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.117.227.40] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: bloat Subject: Re: [Bloat] RRUL for netperf (bad hack) X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 17:05:24 -0000 Lars- Looking now - Thinking back, I probably hacked it in myself. I do not see = it on my road Linux laptop, so I will check on my servers when I am back in= the office.=20 Bill Ver Steeg -----Original Message----- From: Eggert, Lars [mailto:lars@netapp.com]=20 Sent: Friday, April 17, 2015 12:38 PM To: Bill Ver Steeg (versteb) Cc: bloat Subject: Re: RRUL for netperf (bad hack) Hi, On 2015-4-17, at 18:18, Bill Ver Steeg (versteb) wrote: >=20 > Iperf also has some one-way and two-way delay measurements (or at least t= he version I used last year did). It also put timestamps in the payload of = the packets. got a pointer to that version of iperf? I only see some latency-related stu= ff for UDP flows. Thanks, Lars