not huge on bonding, simpler to just get the two uplinks and split
flows across them with an sqm instance for each and a tc hash
directing flows at one or another.
On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 7:30 AM Daniel Sterling
<sterling.daniel@gmail.com> wrote:
>
When I had both DSL and cable modem, I compiled Linux with this patch set to make multi gateway NAT work and it worked great
http://ja.ssi.bg/#routes
Should be able to use that plus ifb+cake on each NIC to do the right thing, aye?
As an aside, I'm kind of furious that NAT fix never got merged upstream :( it's so useful for multiple uplinks
-- Dan
On May 3, 2020, at 10:23 AM, Rich Brown <richb.hanover@gmail.com> wrote:
Given the crummy internet service in my area (DSL, max of 15mbps/1mbps), I wonder if we could improve things by getting a second connection from our ISP and "bonding" the two links together in my OpenWrt router.
I see both Multiwan (which is self-described as old) and mwan3.
But neither would seem to offer the kinds of latency control (SQM/fq_codel/cake) that the cool kids in networking have come to expect.
Any recommendations from this group for such an effort? Thanks.
Rich
Bloat mailing list
Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
Bloat mailing list
Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat