From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <chromatix99@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-we0-f171.google.com (mail-we0-f171.google.com
	[74.125.82.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
	Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 961DB2022B8;
	Tue, 15 May 2012 22:55:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wejx9 with SMTP id x9so412889wej.16
	for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 15 May 2012 22:55:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc
	:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer;
	bh=S2oNKpdaX8TepmnGjS3boOptlS6vYECI4W9yLJrxKqo=;
	b=L//F1UmLDpCRKs2UNVdhM/K6g3Tfw22upbnai8a1wa6ayf3vcnegY33ZbAovZZRd6k
	H2CTms76SafFu0PHZi6biqeOME3qqntcC9+Y2IBbiVfI65Tf0ozTc/RS1teG2CEZsiRd
	k0LSou4aqa3GlneBFhXptYDuKfXM60/J0LkMHCJcUo032MTOgAhKVp9v3Lj02ggNOb7z
	hjELpR6c3oymbmikDxEhQJg6RN1bU81wPy/YjuE2KNVZImopSUtR9QXMUPyeyTZ11FFS
	Lk7r359e0mK2jX1Vx3iBpE6CA0Y8Ec+sSRDoVv0vFCJvJVhPktHoz4OCzYaLezHC9l1r
	gCBQ==
Received: by 10.180.84.4 with SMTP id u4mr4563512wiy.2.1337147708448;
	Tue, 15 May 2012 22:55:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.239.204] (xdsl-83-150-84-172.nebulazone.fi.
	[83.150.84.172])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m1sm16304256wic.6.2012.05.15.22.55.07
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
	Tue, 15 May 2012 22:55:07 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALw1_Q3iJ6o5du7GsO-VFObAyfett+Wuhq-pE_4Xaj1F+Vdw8A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 08:55:05 +0300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B4D136A1-AF2D-4E98-91CC-D7098D040E91@gmail.com>
References: <CAA93jw7EUSf-NAg9q6oxRms5LQopO-VseYUtXAyCkUi=Yitx-g@mail.gmail.com>
	<4FA9FDC0.9010600@superduper.net>
	<CALw1_Q3iJ6o5du7GsO-VFObAyfett+Wuhq-pE_4Xaj1F+Vdw8A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Kevin Gross <kevin.gross@avanw.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net, bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Bloat] The challenge
X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat <bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/bloat>,
	<mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat>
List-Post: <mailto:bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat>,
	<mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 05:55:11 -0000


On 9 May, 2012, at 4:04 pm, Kevin Gross wrote:

> =46rom the paper (figure 7), you can see that CoDel still leaves =
spikes of buffer occupancy when network conditions change. These will =
still be disruptive to real-time traffic. Many networks that need QoS =
now will still need QoS. Networks that do not have QoS will be much more =
usable with CoDel.

Combining AQM with FQ certainly seems like a good idea to me.  I haven't =
had a chance to try the implementation of fq_codel which already exists =
yet, but it's compiled and just waiting for me to get around to it.  If =
it works, then it should be an excellent default.

 - Jonathan Morton