From: Dev <dev@logicalwebhost.com>
To: bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: [Bloat] transparenty bridge/tap with fq_codel
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 16:01:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <B707A0BE-5B2D-4BBD-A767-DF82589C6E8A@logicalwebhost.com> (raw)
I built a transparent bridge on a Debian platform earlier running fq_codel between eth2 and eth3 as br0 which seemed to improve throughput.
Now, I’m wondering if there’s a way to copy some of those packets to another onboard NIC eth4 for analysis on another box on the network. How significant of a performance hit will this be on commodity hardware on my bridge throughput, and/or what is best practices? Has anyone already done this and made it work?
next reply other threads:[~2019-03-11 23:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-11 23:01 Dev [this message]
2019-03-12 1:04 ` Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=B707A0BE-5B2D-4BBD-A767-DF82589C6E8A@logicalwebhost.com \
--to=dev@logicalwebhost.com \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox