From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp96.ord1d.emailsrvr.com (smtp96.ord1d.emailsrvr.com [184.106.54.96]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EEFD33B2A4 for ; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 19:01:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtp13.relay.ord1d.emailsrvr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp13.relay.ord1d.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id A715DC04C7 for ; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 19:01:37 -0400 (EDT) X-SMTPDoctor-Processed: csmtpprox beta Received: from smtp13.relay.ord1d.emailsrvr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp13.relay.ord1d.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id A4F49C04B4 for ; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 19:01:37 -0400 (EDT) X-Auth-ID: dev@logicalwebhost.com Received: by smtp13.relay.ord1d.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: dev-AT-logicalwebhost.com) with ESMTPSA id 753C6C053C for ; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 19:01:37 -0400 (EDT) X-Sender-Id: dev@logicalwebhost.com Received: from [192.168.2.157] (97-90-101-114.static.mdfd.or.charter.com [97.90.101.114]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 0.0.0.0:25 (trex/5.7.12); Mon, 11 Mar 2019 19:01:37 -0400 From: Dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.2 \(3445.102.3\)) Message-Id: Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 16:01:36 -0700 To: bloat X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.102.3) Subject: [Bloat] transparenty bridge/tap with fq_codel X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 23:01:38 -0000 I built a transparent bridge on a Debian platform earlier running = fq_codel between eth2 and eth3 as br0 which seemed to improve = throughput.=20 Now, I=E2=80=99m wondering if there=E2=80=99s a way to copy some of = those packets to another onboard NIC eth4 for analysis on another box on = the network. How significant of a performance hit will this be on = commodity hardware on my bridge throughput, and/or what is best = practices? Has anyone already done this and made it work?=