> On Jun 5, 2015, at 11:02 AM, Simon Barber wrote: > > Very cool. Does this mean that Cisco are not planning on enforcing any IP rights over PIE? I think Cisco stands by its IPR statement on the topic. > Simon > > On 6/4/2015 3:06 PM, Hironori Okano -X (hokano - AAP3 INC at Cisco) wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I’m Hironori Okano and Fred’s intern. >> I’d like to let you know that I have implemented FQ-PIE as a linux kernel module “fq-pie" and iproute2 for fq-pie. >> This was done in collaboration with others at Cisco including Fred Baker, Rong Pan, Bill Ver Steeg, and Preethi Natarajan. >> >> The source codes are in my github repository. I attached patch file “fq-pie_patch.tar.gz” to this email also. >> I’m using the latest linux kernel (git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git) >> >> fq-pie kernel module >> https://github.com/hironoriokano/fq-pie.git >> >> iproute2 for fq-pie >> https://github.com/hironoriokano/iproute2_fq-pie.git >> >> If you have any comments, please reach out to me. >> >> Best regards, >> >> Hironori Okano >> hokano@cisco.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Bloat mailing list >> Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat > > _______________________________________________ > aqm mailing list > aqm@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm