From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "rcdn-iport.cisco.com", Issuer "HydrantID SSL ICA G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1363221F345 for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2015 13:17:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=7407; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1434572292; x=1435781892; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=eiMfWVeabxTE/CYw2fhka+P5cFIrneMoCQkuMrF0kOU=; b=WGek7i7rxvpgI5Tx8ysujV5knDkZKAgGylRMNwXI3NZdtAeiKuTOxC0V 7/CSTlM9N5Mv+8KeLoEnf2oFjbrs50gRlWcBc2j2OEqmMzPOIDK7UR39p vMpkUgTFcwi6XQ62HAomxU3BzMd4ZW516o3w6YzpZbByOYBxxe0LK1Dqg U=; X-Files: signature.asc : 487 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AQBQCO1YFV/5ldJa1cgxBUXwa9LYIQAQmFeAKBOjsRAQEBAQEBAYEKhCIBAQEDAQEBAWsLBQsCAQgYJwcnAQoUEQIEDgUOiBkIDccbAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBF4tEhCMRAVEHCYMOgRQFk2gBgiGBTWSEK4JJgTSECpJiERVjgxZvAYELOoECAQEB X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,634,1427760000"; d="asc'?scan'208,217";a="2485782" Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP; 17 Jun 2015 20:17:43 +0000 Received: from xhc-rcd-x13.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x13.cisco.com [173.37.183.87]) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t5HKHh2s032366 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 17 Jun 2015 20:17:43 GMT Received: from xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.9.178]) by xhc-rcd-x13.cisco.com ([173.37.183.87]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Wed, 17 Jun 2015 15:17:42 -0500 From: "Fred Baker (fred)" To: Simon Barber Thread-Topic: [aqm] [Bloat] FQ-PIE kernel module implementation Thread-Index: AQHQqTqqKQaTPI+uzU+Qe8cQQwMWVQ== Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 20:17:42 +0000 Message-ID: References: <5571E450.7090209@superduper.net> In-Reply-To: <5571E450.7090209@superduper.net> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.19.64.123] Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_94ECC1D5-0720-43BC-B15E-070C3B732889"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "Rong Pan \(ropan\)" , "Preethi Natarajan \(prenatar\)" , "aqm@ietf.org" , "bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Bloat] [aqm] FQ-PIE kernel module implementation X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 20:18:13 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_94ECC1D5-0720-43BC-B15E-070C3B732889 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_681B49D0-944B-4FA5-8D87-7713BB55C04A" --Apple-Mail=_681B49D0-944B-4FA5-8D87-7713BB55C04A Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 > On Jun 5, 2015, at 11:02 AM, Simon Barber = wrote: >=20 > Very cool. Does this mean that Cisco are not planning on enforcing any = IP rights over PIE? I think Cisco stands by its IPR statement on the topic. > Simon >=20 > On 6/4/2015 3:06 PM, Hironori Okano -X (hokano - AAP3 INC at Cisco) = wrote: >> Hi all, >>=20 >> I=92m Hironori Okano and Fred=92s intern. >> I=92d like to let you know that I have implemented FQ-PIE as a linux = kernel module =93fq-pie" and iproute2 for fq-pie. >> This was done in collaboration with others at Cisco including Fred = Baker, Rong Pan, Bill Ver Steeg, and Preethi Natarajan. >>=20 >> The source codes are in my github repository. I attached patch file = =93fq-pie_patch.tar.gz=94 to this email also. >> I=92m using the latest linux kernel = (git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git) >>=20 >> fq-pie kernel module >> https://github.com/hironoriokano/fq-pie.git = >>=20 >> iproute2 for fq-pie >> https://github.com/hironoriokano/iproute2_fq-pie.git = >>=20 >> If you have any comments, please reach out to me. >>=20 >> Best regards, >>=20 >> Hironori Okano >> hokano@cisco.com >>=20 >> _______________________________________________ >> Bloat mailing list >> Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat = >=20 > _______________________________________________ > aqm mailing list > aqm@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm --Apple-Mail=_681B49D0-944B-4FA5-8D87-7713BB55C04A Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252
On Jun 5, 2015, at 11:02 AM, Simon Barber <simon@superduper.net> wrote:

=20
Very cool. Does this mean that Cisco are not planning on enforcing any IP rights over PIE?

I think Cisco stands by its IPR statement on the = topic.

Simon

On 6/4/2015 3:06 PM, Hironori Okano = -X (hokano - AAP3 INC at Cisco) wrote:
=20
Hi all,

I=92m Hironori Okano and Fred=92s = intern. 
I=92d like to let you know that I have implemented = FQ-PIE as a linux kernel module =93fq-pie" and iproute2 for fq-pie.
This was done in collaboration with others at = Cisco including Fred Baker, Rong Pan, Bill Ver Steeg, and Preethi = Natarajan.

The source codes are in my github repository. I = attached patch file =93fq-pie_patch.tar.gz=94 to this email also.
I=92m using the latest linux kernel (git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git= )

fq-pie kernel module
https://github.com/hironoriokano/fq-pie.git

iproute2 for fq-pie
https://github.com/hironoriokano/iproute2_fq-pie.git

If you have any comments, please reach out to = me.

Best regards,

Hironori Okano
hokano@cisco.com


_______________________________________________
Bloat mailing list
Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.buffer=
bloat.net/listinfo/bloat

_______________________________________________
aqm = mailing list
aqm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm

= --Apple-Mail=_681B49D0-944B-4FA5-8D87-7713BB55C04A-- --Apple-Mail=_94ECC1D5-0720-43BC-B15E-070C3B732889 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQEVAwUBVYHV5J9ieig10VPpAQLqfAf7Bim9dHqtHRPB2fXIp3y9SmFIW/Ir64Wv bVDTNFyADwwNfDYzTsf2AYR8nH0hYct0Ivk4fkdxdMA7f4YxLlblAVVKpHD69EJo f6Iv3Dx3V5OqR4KFwKrT6C4aIQozhXd6bWdIwhfTYcEXqabhNzdEkZ61Wf6jBpQL 2dR00K1kCeFObRe1wFyc3wGDC+/zEhnpLeQBiErZiyTS3BCFEx1JDUIsGkwgLf9q EHaeI3SVo9uALXMjdxAuIctz3rkxj3LsTjJLnjSRfdYka21Ju6UnBCu8DA5uHeHS oCGdYHOuagDMqSze4P7WqzjSJx1SscL2I1nJfPrpSD4+Ji9fu0eXqA== =obAv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_94ECC1D5-0720-43BC-B15E-070C3B732889--