From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-la0-x22e.google.com (mail-la0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::22e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8969021F450 for ; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 10:41:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by labbd9 with SMTP id bd9so111837675lab.2 for ; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 10:41:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=a1NrJ+yd80XBDanaKF8SHLt7eIs5gXnItyI3y6/pkLI=; b=ibLYNu77xQUdmZxi86ibj7MRV4hUdBgsZ/Q81oQL7uLNxoejkl/5kUs/HhwmzX6aoe cWEglSq+48R9h/gz3ZCaoR5UgS05ehgTcVywUwETq78jZqJu0iPWztVY8ro7/lPVUIlH G9wi6KJlMKGXBpHwBdhroP5jXofkdHJa1kHI+cOdlU8sFNJLXhVQ2q5BAoibM0Om4WBm 1GlgZfEZkqiin4DZoRgt6kB9zPSGumis9rxuUVFmuqoZcQr4DSoVj9pioxk3N/wP/o9T J9jsuYSpopv1Uknc0nS93o67/lm3/mKNlZICc90VLO+9FwAO3+PyMTUwL8XdxhF8hGCA Sqag== X-Received: by 10.152.26.34 with SMTP id i2mr12219627lag.117.1429465305746; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 10:41:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bass.home.chromatix.fi (188-67-141-134.bb.dnainternet.fi. [188.67.141.134]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id k2sm3787094lag.9.2015.04.19.10.41.38 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 19 Apr 2015 10:41:44 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2098\)) From: Jonathan Morton In-Reply-To: <8AD4493E-EA21-496D-923D-B4257B078A1C@gmx.de> Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 20:41:27 +0300 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <75C1DDFF-FBD2-4825-A167-92DFCF6A7713@gmail.com> <8AD4493E-EA21-496D-923D-B4257B078A1C@gmx.de> To: Sebastian Moeller X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2098) Cc: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Bloat] DSLReports Speed Test has latency measurement built-in X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 17:42:17 -0000 > On 19 Apr, 2015, at 19:30, Sebastian Moeller wrote: >=20 >> Frequency readouts are probably more accessible to the latter. >=20 > The frequency domain more accessible to laypersons? I have my = doubts ;) Gamers, at least, are familiar with =93frames per second=94 and how that = corresponds to their monitor=92s refresh rate. The desirable range of = latencies, when converted to Hz, happens to be roughly the same as the = range of desirable framerates. - Jonathan Morton