General list for discussing Bufferbloat
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: dave greenfield <dave@stanalytics.com>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Cc: bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Bloat] Network computing article on bloat
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 21:28:05 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=XmU07UH74vAueBFKB3R0ETgGWGA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTimrxy6=8NQ+VpysJiRcWCX6RpbrWA@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2274 bytes --]

Thanks, Dave. I'm actually NOT under the impression that packet loss is the
dark lord incarnate. Yes, I too would have preferred a different title, but
editors have the last say sometimes. Oh, and insertion latency or insertion
loss isn't all that new. I've seen it used in switch and device design for
several years. Call it what you will, but it's important that IT understands
the amount of latency introduced by a given device into the data path. This
isn't always widely discussed in WAN opt circles.....

Dave

PS Can we please have someone else jump in here who's name is NOT Dave!


On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 9:17 PM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:

> "Big Buffers Bad. Small Buffers Good."
>
> "*Some* packet loss is essential for the correct operation of the Internet"
>
> are two of the memes I try to propagate, in their simplicity. Even
> then there are so many qualifiers to both of those that the core
> message gets lost.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Dave Hart <davehart@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 17:05 UTC, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> Not bad, although I can live without the title. Coins a new-ish phrase
> >> "insertion latency"
> >>
> >>
> http://www.networkcomputing.com/end-to-end-apm/bufferbloat-and-the-collapse-of-the-internet.php
> >
> > The piece ends with a paragraph claiming preventing packet loss is
> > addressing a more fundamental problem which contributes to
> > bufferbloat.  As long as the writer and readers believe packet loss is
> > an unmitigated evil, the battle is lost.  More encouraging would have
> > been a statement that packet loss is preferable to excessive queueing
> > and a required TCP feedback signal when ECN isn't in play.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Dave Hart
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Dave Täht
> SKYPE: davetaht
> US Tel: 1-239-829-5608
> http://the-edge.blogspot.com
>



-- 
---
Dave Greenfield
Principal
Strategic Technology Analytics
Research. Analysis. Insight

<dave@stanalytics.com>dave@stanalytics.com | 1-908-206-4114
 Netmagdave  |  @Netmagdave
Blogs: ZDNet  <http://www.blogs.zdnet.com/greenfield> | Information
Week<http://www.networkcomputing.com/author_profile.php?name=dgreenfield&page_no=1>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3879 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2011-04-26 18:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-26 17:05 Dave Taht
2011-04-26 18:13 ` Dave Hart
2011-04-26 18:17   ` Dave Taht
2011-04-26 18:28     ` dave greenfield [this message]
2011-04-26 18:32     ` Wesley Eddy
2011-04-26 19:37       ` Dave Taht
2011-04-26 20:21         ` Wesley Eddy
2011-04-26 20:30           ` Constantine Dovrolis
2011-04-26 21:16             ` Dave Taht
2011-04-27 17:10           ` Bill Sommerfeld
2011-04-27 17:40             ` Wesley Eddy
2011-04-27  7:43       ` Jonathan Morton
2011-04-30 15:56       ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2011-04-30 19:18       ` [Bloat] Goodput fraction w/ AQM vs bufferbloat Richard Scheffenegger
2011-05-05 16:01         ` Jim Gettys
2011-05-05 16:10           ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-05-05 16:30             ` Jim Gettys
2011-05-05 16:49             ` [Bloat] Burst Loss Neil Davies
2011-05-05 18:34               ` Jim Gettys
2011-05-06 11:40               ` Sam Stickland
2011-05-06 11:53                 ` Neil Davies
2011-05-08 12:42               ` Richard Scheffenegger
2011-05-09 18:06                 ` Rick Jones
2011-05-11  8:53                   ` Richard Scheffenegger
2011-05-11  9:53                     ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-12 14:16                       ` [Bloat] Publications Richard Scheffenegger
2011-05-12 16:31                   ` [Bloat] Burst Loss Fred Baker
2011-05-12 16:41                     ` Rick Jones
2011-05-12 17:11                       ` Fred Baker
2011-05-13  5:00                     ` Kevin Gross
2011-05-13 14:35                       ` Rick Jones
2011-05-13 14:54                         ` Dave Taht
2011-05-13 20:03                           ` [Bloat] Jumbo frames and LAN buffers (was: RE: Burst Loss) Kevin Gross
2011-05-14 20:48                             ` Fred Baker
2011-05-15 18:28                               ` Jonathan Morton
2011-05-15 20:49                                 ` Fred Baker
2011-05-16  0:31                                   ` Jonathan Morton
2011-05-16  7:51                                     ` Richard Scheffenegger
2011-05-16  9:49                                       ` Fred Baker
2011-05-16 11:23                                         ` [Bloat] Jumbo frames and LAN buffers Jim Gettys
2011-05-16 13:15                                           ` Kevin Gross
2011-05-16 13:22                                             ` Jim Gettys
2011-05-16 13:42                                               ` Kevin Gross
2011-05-16 15:23                                                 ` Jim Gettys
     [not found]                                               ` <-854731558634984958@unknownmsgid>
2011-05-16 13:45                                                 ` Dave Taht
2011-05-16 18:36                                             ` Richard Scheffenegger
2011-05-16 18:11                                         ` [Bloat] Jumbo frames and LAN buffers (was: RE: Burst Loss) Richard Scheffenegger
2011-05-17  7:49                               ` BeckW
2011-05-17 14:16                                 ` Dave Taht
     [not found]                           ` <-4629065256951087821@unknownmsgid>
2011-05-13 20:21                             ` Dave Taht
2011-05-13 22:36                               ` Kevin Gross
2011-05-13 22:08                           ` [Bloat] Burst Loss david
2011-05-13 19:32                         ` Denton Gentry
2011-05-13 20:47                           ` Rick Jones
2011-05-06  4:18           ` [Bloat] Goodput fraction w/ AQM vs bufferbloat Fred Baker
2011-05-06 15:14             ` richard
2011-05-06 21:56               ` Fred Baker
2011-05-06 22:10                 ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-05-07 16:39                   ` Jonathan Morton
2011-05-08  0:15                     ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-05-08  3:04                       ` Constantine Dovrolis
2011-05-08 13:00                 ` Richard Scheffenegger
2011-05-08 12:53               ` Richard Scheffenegger
2011-05-08 12:34             ` Richard Scheffenegger
2011-05-09  3:07               ` Fred Baker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='BANLkTi=XmU07UH74vAueBFKB3R0ETgGWGA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=dave@stanalytics.com \
    --cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox