From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <georgeb@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-ww0-f47.google.com (mail-ww0-f47.google.com [74.125.82.47])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
	Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6ECA8201A7A
	for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Tue, 31 May 2011 12:12:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wwk4 with SMTP id 4so4847984wwk.28
	for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Tue, 31 May 2011 12:28:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
	:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=ktceJZyIa2xjI9aX+r7SuBIO9cHv229sl1nh+qQsx3s=;
	b=sTu5WvFTsNkYRel1jJ04NNM6VoxsWx6JQyb26DPtOxLhmmOEH2HMMdDOUVGUJBizZj
	Pq0lHpWSiGHYPAHVejFjx0V7nPBRME9RiOlIeNkoKr8WI+gxm/kVQIwZB+JBU5LiTqiE
	ok0PswxFEwp0wOsB4lLblpotgxZeKUlj6x7nI=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	b=wQFD85r3W0WDdJHNtax1WnMREmlwiuhU4TKzbULIBLhRdkWmGyXJxj3mLOd+Td7qvC
	ufOXLfSvxqIGhGg/A9odmBGJ3CnF35MGCEi1DI7a7p6ujoy6kzKUcU5wbiAS3yBWg8wq
	r2BW7uSFrOWGMNK+xkC6CNaYWH2VePNaqBevE=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.142.224 with SMTP id i74mr7047539wej.3.1306870138300; Tue,
	31 May 2011 12:28:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.185.13 with HTTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 12:28:58 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTinwVuaq5Ru-g9YQAfBVb5b4yT+aE+HB5jr+u6J+u5mtZA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <BANLkTikHEBoxz1JtkscYbAzp4SGVT=s06Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTinwVuaq5Ru-g9YQAfBVb5b4yT+aE+HB5jr+u6J+u5mtZA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 12:28:58 -0700
Message-ID: <BANLkTikKb6sekJduho3q3Ha+mQmVM6Vn_Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: "George B." <georgeb@gmail.com>
To: Bill Sommerfeld <wsommerfeld@google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Bloat] philosophical question
X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat <bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/bloat>,
	<mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat>
List-Post: <mailto:bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat>,
	<mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 19:12:10 -0000

> Philosophical rhetorical question: If the bottlenecks are all outside
> your network, where do you expect a queue to build up? =A0Where are you
> storing packets that can't be sent right away?
>
> I'd think the TCP congestion control algorithms would be the thing to
> worry about, rather than qdiscs...

Yeah, that's where I'm leaning, too.  westwood+ combined with the
tcp-thin should be the ticket, I would thing.

George