From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>,
jdb@comx.dk, bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Bloat] Notes about hacking on AQMs
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 09:51:34 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTimV_6C4dFb2LBMqWXE1jaMu=w0rpQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1307547908.3057.53.camel@edumazet-laptop>
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote:
> Le mercredi 08 juin 2011 à 11:27 -0400, Jesper Dangaard Brouer a écrit :
>
>> While this is a good coding approach, the end result is that nobody is
>> using this stuff, because "tc" is so difficult to use, and its error
>> feedback is so lousy that you will never figure out your small syntax
>> errors.
>>
>
> Well, I agree its really hard to even use 10% of tc features, but isnt
> human brain has the same problem ? ;)
>
> Most people playing with AQM setups are using scripts, or even script
> generators for complex/dynamic cases.
And they are *all* wrong to varying extents, which is why I like the
'mondo classifier' idea for DSCP+firewalling mentioned earlier on this
thread. Converging on several standards for packet marking vs the
adhoc-ness of thousands of different partial solutions that now exist
really makes sense to me.
>
>
>
>
--
Dave Täht
SKYPE: davetaht
US Tel: 1-239-829-5608
http://the-edge.blogspot.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-08 15:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-08 12:12 Dave Taht
2011-06-08 12:56 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-06-08 13:32 ` Dave Taht
2011-06-08 14:04 ` Dave Taht
2011-06-08 14:57 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-06-08 15:20 ` Dave Taht
2011-06-08 15:21 ` Dave Taht
2011-06-23 22:38 ` Juliusz Chroboczek
2011-06-23 22:47 ` Dave Taht
2011-06-08 15:27 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2011-06-08 15:45 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-06-08 15:51 ` Dave Taht [this message]
2011-06-08 16:41 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-06-08 16:52 ` Dave Taht
2011-06-08 17:50 ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-06-08 23:06 ` Thomas Graf
2011-06-09 17:18 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2011-06-09 16:04 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2011-06-09 16:14 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-06-09 17:20 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='BANLkTimV_6C4dFb2LBMqWXE1jaMu=w0rpQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=jdb@comx.dk \
--cc=tgraf@suug.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox