From: "Thomas Hühn" <thomas@net.t-labs.tu-berlin.de>
To: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
Cc: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net,
Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
Subject: Re: [Bloat] ARAMIS: impressive wifi rate and channel width control algorithm for MIMO networks
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 11:23:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <C70B84FB-9654-46DC-AEA5-43724CB97723@net.t-labs.tu-berlin.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52A86B6A.8040600@openwrt.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1219 bytes --]
Am 11.12.2013 um 14:40 schrieb Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>:
> On 2013-12-10 09:33, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
>>> http://cs.ucsb.edu/~laradeek/Secon13.pdf
>>
>> Do you understand why ARAMIS with training performs so much better than
>> Minstrel in the
>> 20 MHz interferer case?
> One reason could be that the tests were made using the ancient 2.6.32
> kernel. I've added many improvements and fixes to minstrel_ht since that
> release.
>
Iw as quite surprised why certain system research publications do still not provide sufficient information that enables someone to repeat their experiments. What version of the mac80211 subsystem did they used ? The reference just states: [6] Minstrel HT Linux Wireless, ”http://linuxwireless.org/en/developers”
Unfortunately there are many system relevant papers within networking that do not provide sufficient citations and experiment descriptions about software version (e.g. GIT hash), date, ect.
It appears to me that also reviewers do not put enough value to that.
Thomas
> - Felix
> _______________________________________________
> Bloat mailing list
> Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2041 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-12 10:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-10 6:44 Dave Taht
2013-12-10 8:33 ` Juliusz Chroboczek
2013-12-11 13:40 ` Felix Fietkau
2013-12-12 10:23 ` Thomas Hühn [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=C70B84FB-9654-46DC-AEA5-43724CB97723@net.t-labs.tu-berlin.de \
--to=thomas@net.t-labs.tu-berlin.de \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr \
--cc=nbd@openwrt.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox