From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.net.t-labs.tu-berlin.de (mail.net.t-labs.tu-berlin.de [IPv6:2001:470:96b9:4:130:149:220:252]) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DB8821F1FA for ; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 02:23:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from client-79.wlan.dai-lab.de (unknown [130.149.154.36]) by mail.net.t-labs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1E75A80B06; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 11:23:06 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_DF92891D-C707-4307-B892-12A6249100C0" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1822\)) From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Thomas_H=FChn?= In-Reply-To: <52A86B6A.8040600@openwrt.org> Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 11:23:05 +0100 Message-Id: References: <595a643098da2500da744c00a8cccd60@imap.pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <52A86B6A.8040600@openwrt.org> To: Felix Fietkau X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1822) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 13:42:43 -0800 Cc: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net, Juliusz Chroboczek Subject: Re: [Bloat] ARAMIS: impressive wifi rate and channel width control algorithm for MIMO networks X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 10:23:10 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_DF92891D-C707-4307-B892-12A6249100C0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Am 11.12.2013 um 14:40 schrieb Felix Fietkau : > On 2013-12-10 09:33, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: >>> http://cs.ucsb.edu/~laradeek/Secon13.pdf >>=20 >> Do you understand why ARAMIS with training performs so much better = than=20 >> Minstrel in the >> 20 MHz interferer case? > One reason could be that the tests were made using the ancient 2.6.32 > kernel. I've added many improvements and fixes to minstrel_ht since = that > release. >=20 Iw as quite surprised why certain system research publications do still = not provide sufficient information that enables someone to repeat their = experiments. What version of the mac80211 subsystem did they used ? The = reference just states: [6] Minstrel HT Linux Wireless, = =94http://linuxwireless.org/en/developers=94 Unfortunately there are many system relevant papers within networking = that do not provide sufficient citations and experiment descriptions = about software version (e.g. GIT hash), date, ect. It appears to me that also reviewers do not put enough value to that.=20 Thomas > - Felix > _______________________________________________ > Bloat mailing list > Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat --Apple-Mail=_DF92891D-C707-4307-B892-12A6249100C0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252
Am 11.12.2013 um 14:40 schrieb Felix = Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>:

On = 2013-12-10 09:33, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
http://cs.ucsb.edu/~lara= deek/Secon13.pdf

Do you understand why ARAMIS = with training performs so much better than
Minstrel in the
20 MHz = interferer case?
One reason could be that the tests were = made using the ancient 2.6.32
kernel. I've added many improvements = and fixes to minstrel_ht since = that
release.


Iw as quite = surprised why certain system research publications do still not provide = sufficient information that enables someone to repeat their experiments. = What version of the mac80211 subsystem did they used ? The reference = just states: [6] Minstrel HT Linux Wireless, =94http://linuxwireless.org/en/developers=94
Unfortunately there are = many system relevant papers within networking that do not provide = sufficient citations and experiment descriptions about software version = (e.g. GIT hash), date, ect.
It appears to me that also = reviewers do not put enough value to = that. 

Thomas


<= /div>
- = Felix
_______________________________________________
Bloat = mailing list
Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
= --Apple-Mail=_DF92891D-C707-4307-B892-12A6249100C0--