From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mtv-iport-3.cisco.com (mtv-iport-3.cisco.com [173.36.130.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mtv-iport-3.cisco.com", Issuer "Cisco SSCA2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82E23201044 for ; Sat, 7 Apr 2012 17:00:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=fred@cisco.com; l=490; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1333843228; x=1335052828; h=subject:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id: references:to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JZYHU/ig+0wgIqjZwRY3P4HVEB39pTzRmIMJI4Vd69Y=; b=XCidfpQ4N7go8oDNb52bpGHfiKwlUEtcascB/LxmK/FQVw78/9E/Yd74 xtyX+2ccxp+HkNSXI6focqFL7ykmIiC5ZUMUd3nk5pRMKL7wGtfx0tyTs WvJEj6JiBi7iZ8c31pKYQV3PFRDhiCCHbxNWWO/qqJ7YSm8XELXdB0sge U=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EANDUgE+rRDoJ/2dsb2JhbABDuTCBB4IJAQEBAwESASc/BQsLRlcGNYdnBAyeYZczj3djBIhajRKBEYRhiFuBaYMH X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,388,1330905600"; d="scan'208";a="36956556" Received: from mtv-core-4.cisco.com ([171.68.58.9]) by mtv-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 08 Apr 2012 00:00:27 +0000 Received: from stealth-10-32-244-222.cisco.com (stealth-10-32-244-222.cisco.com [10.32.244.222]) by mtv-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q3800KVj021516; Sun, 8 Apr 2012 00:00:27 GMT Received: from [127.0.0.1] by stealth-10-32-244-222.cisco.com (PGP Universal service); Sat, 07 Apr 2012 17:00:27 -0700 X-PGP-Universal: processed; by stealth-10-32-244-222.cisco.com on Sat, 07 Apr 2012 17:00:27 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) From: Fred Baker In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2012 16:59:30 -0700 Message-Id: References: <20120406213725.GA12641@uio.no> <20120406222138.GB12641@uio.no> <1333811327.30705.4.camel@edumazet-laptop> <20120407153548.GC21452@uio.no> <20120407181034.GD21452@uio.no> <6D19B807-1B09-4AB5-A727-E9A7449C6A1D@cisco.com> To: Dave Taht X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: bloat Subject: Re: [Bloat] Best practices for paced TCP on Linux? X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2012 00:00:29 -0000 On Apr 7, 2012, at 3:36 PM, Dave Taht wrote: > In my case I'm 196ms away and running this for the past hour or so >=20 > vlc -6 http://pannekake.samfundet.no:3015/ >=20 > seems to show it never really getting out of slow start. Which raises the question of whether the propagation delay is 196 ms or = you're simply not seeing a signal from the network... But your average cwnd should be 83.904109589041096, which probably means = it's 84 or better. What is it actually?=